0:28The board scrutinized the proposed architectural modifications, with architect Ahmed Imara presenting visual exhibits and detailing changes such as enlarged windows for new entrances and the installation of Wendy’s signage in place of the bank’s. Concerns were raised regarding the signage plan, particularly the number of drive-thru signs and their visibility from different angles. Board members sought clarification on the facade’s faux wood composite material, which would replace existing white vinyl. The architect confirmed that exterior changes would be minimal, focusing on enhancing visibility and accessibility.

38:26Engineering discussions revealed logistical challenges associated with vehicle movement on the site. Licensed civil engineer Adam Candel presented an overview of the site plan, addressing modifications to improve vehicle circulation, including the addition of directional signage and an expanded trash enclosure. The site plan proposed 21 parking spaces, exceeding the required 16, with designated spaces for mobile order pickups.

2:13:13Traffic implications were a concern, with insights provided by a traffic expert. However, board members expressed unease regarding potential congestion due to the single entrance and exit point, particularly during peak hours. The expert noted that the traffic impact would not alter existing conditions, and the drive-thru was projected to accommodate a substantial portion of peak hour traffic.

2:57:59The board’s attention then shifted to signage and lighting plans. The proposed signage exceeded zoning limits, prompting a discussion on its visibility and integration with the building’s architecture. A planner presented the drive-thru’s importance in adapting to changing consumer behavior post-pandemic and underscored the site’s visual prominence, arguing for adaptive reuse over new construction. The planner also highlighted the necessity of balancing operational efficiency with community standards.

2:13:13Public concerns arose about the potential trend of converting bank properties into fast-food establishments, with one participant questioning the demand for another drive-thru in the area. The board deliberated on the legal and zoning nuances, focusing on whether the drive-thru could be considered an inherently beneficial use. While restaurants are permitted in the zone, drive-thrus are not, necessitating the variance.

38:26Operational logistics were also examined, with representatives outlining plans for off-peak deliveries and designated areas for mobile order pickups.