The Miller application sought permission to expand their single-family dwelling on Cottage Place due to increased work-from-home needs and family visits. Their architect presented revised plans clarifying lot coverage discrepancies, emphasizing that the addition would increase non-conforming lot coverage on their undersized property. The proposal, which included a new office and bathroom, was deemed compliant with zoning district requirements, despite pushing the property’s lot coverage to 32.3%.

Stormwater management emerged as a pressing topic, with the board deliberating over the cumulative impact of increased impervious surfaces on local drainage. The Miller property, noted for its non-conforming lot size, posed challenges regarding drainage, as existing improvements were previously approved without stormwater management conditions. The board was attentive to ensuring that any new coverage did not exacerbate flooding risks to adjacent properties. Members stressed the need for a robust stormwater management plan, especially given the property’s history and location, which could influence runoff patterns.

In a separate application, the board discussed David Santos’ proposal on Valley Road. The project involved expanding the living room and rebuilding the front porch, necessitating variances for front yard setbacks. The board scrutinized the proposal’s impact on drainage, with particular attention to a shed in the backyard that exceeded size and setback requirements. Discussions highlighted the need for accurate documentation and adherence to zoning standards, with the applicant agreeing to consider measures to address these variances.

Local resident Anna Rizo raised concerns about water management issues, attributing increased basement flooding to alterations in surrounding properties and construction activities. The board took her testimony seriously, acknowledging the potential role of new developments in changing drainage patterns. Rizo’s account of historical drainage challenges, exacerbated by regional weather events, underscored the community’s ongoing struggle with stormwater management.

In response, applicants committed to implementing stormwater mitigation strategies to capture and manage water runoff effectively. The board emphasized that any approved variances would include strict conditions for compliance with stormwater management requirements. These measures aimed to ensure that property developments did not further burden the community’s drainage infrastructure.

The meeting also touched on procedural matters, including the board’s rules and scheduling. Members debated finalizing their operational rules, with a decision to postpone adoption to the next meeting. Scheduling conflicts prompted adjustments to the board’s upcoming meetings.