The committee considered two primary construction delivery methods: the Construction Manager at Risk (CMR) and the traditional design-bid-build. The CMR approach allows for the construction manager’s involvement during the design phase, enabling early bidding on project components and potentially starting construction in June 2026. This timing would take advantage of the summer months, minimizing impact on school activities. In contrast, the design-bid-build method would delay the start until December 2026, extending construction into the school year.

During the meeting, participants debated the logistics and financial implications of both methods. The CMR method was noted for its potential to reduce change orders and improve coordination, though it was acknowledged to carry a 7% premium over traditional methods. This method could facilitate early planning for construction logistics, such as material storage and site organization.

Concerns were raised about potential delays, with some participants arguing that the CMR approach allows for pre-purchasing critical items, mitigating risks related to supply chain issues.

The committee also explored the sustainability certification paths for the project, weighing the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and the Collaborative for High Performance Schools (CHPS). Although CHPS aligns with the district’s focus on indoor performance, LEED was favored for its established recognition and streamlined administrative processes. The committee voted in favor of pursuing LEED certification, meeting the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) requirements and aligning with state and national climate goals.

The committee’s sustainability goals include reducing the building’s carbon footprint and ensuring compliance with Massachusetts’ strict building codes. Discussions highlighted the complexities of modern building requirements, noting overlaps between LEED and CHPS goals and the state’s stretch code. Plans were confirmed to meet the necessary certification levels, focusing on energy efficiency, air quality, and climate resilience.

Additionally, the meeting introduced the concept of advisory groups to provide input on various aspects of the project, including site and sustainability, and athletics facilities. These groups are intended to ensure community engagement and informed decision-making throughout the design process. The committee emphasized the importance of involving stakeholders such as faculty and local organizations to address overlapping concerns like site design and athletic facilities usage.