Longmeadow Select Board Moves Forward with Fiber Network and Appoints New Assessors Board Member

The Longmeadow Select Board meeting on December 16th centered around discussions about a municipal fiber network project and appointments to the Board of Assessors. The board addressed concerns raised by residents and made decisions on appointments, including the unanimous selection of Mike Mlan to the Board of Assessors, which signified a shift towards new perspectives in town governance.

0:00One of the pivotal topics of the meeting was the ongoing deliberation over the establishment of a Municipal Light Plant (MLP) board for overseeing the municipal fiber project. The board addressed resident Tom Shay’s comments, who articulated strong support for the fiber project if managed correctly but raised critical questions about due diligence and governance. Shay emphasized the need for clarity on who has the authority to sign the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) tied to the fiber project. He questioned the role of the town manager and the select board in this process, as well as the legitimacy of the municipal fiber task force’s actions without a formal Request for Proposal. The board recognized the importance of Shay’s inquiries and discussed the need for formal clarification from the town council to ensure the project’s legal compliance and transparency.

43:45Further discussions on the fiber project revealed plans to form the MLP board without requiring a charter change, although it would eventually be advantageous to update the charter to reflect this new board. The process of establishing the MLP board would involve proposing an article at a town meeting to define its structure and delay its formal establishment until at least June 2026. The board considered the potential for the Select Board to initially serve as the MLP board, with the possibility of the current fiber task force continuing in an advisory role. Concerns about potential conflicts of interest, particularly the balance between taxpayer representation and ratepayer interests, were acknowledged but deemed manageable, similar to the board’s role in adjusting water and sewer rates.

0:00In another significant decision, the board appointed Mike Mlan to the Board of Assessors, choosing him over the incumbent Richard Foster to bring fresh perspectives to the assessment processes. Mlan’s qualifications, including his experience on the municipal task force and his ongoing MBA studies, were highlighted as valuable assets for the role. The board’s decision to appoint Mlan was seen as an opportunity to introduce “new eyes” to address the town’s assessment challenges, despite acknowledging Foster’s long-standing contributions and expertise.

15:19Additionally, the meeting addressed infrastructure concerns raised by board members, particularly regarding deferred maintenance issues. The Permanent Building Committee’s discussions on building maintenance were brought to the board’s attention, urging a reevaluation of committee responsibilities to effectively manage these challenges. The conversation underscored the broader implications of infrastructure upkeep and the town’s capacity to address long-term maintenance needs.

Praise was given to the fire department and first responders for their professionalism during recent house fires, with particular commendation for Chief Rigny’s leadership.

58:29Further administrative topics included the annual liquor license renewals, specifically concerning the Bottle Shop’s unresolved renewal due to a lack of communication. The board deliberated on granting a 90-day extension contingent on the submission of a purchase and sale agreement or lease, balancing the need for accountability with the impact of unforeseen circumstances on the business.

Other agenda items included the adoption of FY 2025 goals for the town manager and select board, covering a range of priorities such as policy updates, long-term budgeting, and infrastructure management. Adjustments to the FY 2025 meeting calendar were also discussed, accommodating school vacations and ensuring alignment with budget timelines.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: