The primary focus of the meeting was the public hearing on the rezoning of the property from B3 Central Business to a Planned Unit Development (PUD), which would allow for the construction of the apartment complex. Brian Bugamin of B&B Holdings LLC presented the proposal, which included a three-story building with a partial parking garage and amenities such as a pet park and community room. Bugamin emphasized the market-rate nature of the project, with rental prices ranging from $1,000 for studios to higher amounts for larger units. He assured the council that a professional management company would handle tenant applications to ensure quality residents.

Public opposition was strong, with residents voicing concerns about the potential impact on crime, community dynamics, and property values. David Forsa, a resident and former police officer, argued against the complex, citing the challenges of managing rental properties and the potential for increased crime compared to homeownership. He suggested alternatives such as local businesses or affordable townhomes to stimulate economic growth and provide employment opportunities.

Other residents echoed Forsa’s concerns. Steve Swinger, also a former police officer, and Barb Stripsky, a former school employee, shared experiences of negative impacts from similar developments in other communities. They warned of potential increases in crime and behavioral issues, expressing a desire to preserve Lonsdale’s peaceful environment. Despite these concerns, some residents acknowledged the need for housing options, with Shannon Price suggesting townhomes as a potential compromise.

The council addressed various technical aspects of the proposal, including the adequacy of existing sewer and water services, which were deemed sufficient. Questions about potential tax increment financing (TIF) districts and public subsidies were raised, but it was clarified that no applications for public subsidies had been received. Concerns about traffic and fire safety were also discussed, with assurances that state statutes require fire suppression systems and that the fire department would be involved in the site plan review process.

Despite the overwhelming public opposition, some council members noted demand for rental housing in the area, supported by a recent market study. They pointed out that young families and individuals seeking housing close to family members were among those interested in the development. The council also discussed the potential financial benefits of the $10 million project, including increased funding through utility fees and contributions for park improvements.