Council members articulated varying viewpoints, with some expressing concerns about the increased traffic that could result from the extension, potentially affecting nearby residential areas. Others questioned the urgency of the project, given the lack of immediate congestion issues, while noting that the prospect of further business development in the area could justify the extension. The discourse underscored the split in priorities among council members, with a focus on balancing community interests with fiscal responsibility.

A guest speaker, Adam Traxler from First National Bank, emphasized the importance of completing the road extension to enhance business attractiveness, noting that the empty lot’s current situation is less appealing to potential tenants. Traxler highlighted safety concerns due to pedestrian traffic in the area. Discussions also touched on the feasibility of obtaining state aid for road projects, with council members awaiting a demographic report due in April, which will be crucial for future funding considerations.

The council acknowledged the need for further exploration of the Baldwin Street extension, recognizing that financial implications and community sentiment must be carefully weighed. While no definitive conclusions were reached, the meeting emphasized the importance of continued dialogue and collaborative decision-making among stakeholders.

In addition to the road extension, the council discussed the potential design and installation of new signage at City Hall. The debate focused on whether to include digital elements, with concerns raised about the high costs associated with digital signage, ranging from $74,000 to $80,000, and whether drivers would have sufficient time to read digital messages given the speed limit on Highway 19. Suggestions for simpler, cost-effective monument signs were proposed. The council agreed on the necessity of further research to finalize signage plans that effectively represent the city while adhering to financial limitations.

The meeting also addressed the complex issue of leasing or selling the new City Hall building. While there was interest from a business in leasing part of the building, council members expressed concerns about the implications of leasing, particularly around access, security, and potential property management challenges. The council emphasized the importance of maintaining City Hall as a community space, reflecting on its original purpose and investment.

Infrastructure concerns were another focal point, with discussions on street maintenance, the need for a proactive pavement management plan, and the challenges posed by unpaved alleys. The council acknowledged the necessity of budgeting for road improvements and explored funding options such as franchise fees and state aid to distribute financial burdens. The idea of assessments for street improvements was also considered, emphasizing the need for transparency and community buy-in to justify prioritization decisions.