The potential introduction of a chicken ordinance dominated discussions. The council is revisiting the topic after the Planning Commission previously voted against pursuing the matter. A motion was made to present a chicken ordinance at the next Planning Commission meeting. A public hearing is planned to gather community feedback, acknowledging the vocal interest in allowing backyard chickens within city limits. One participant noted the successful implementation of similar ordinances in neighboring cities like Minneapolis and St. Paul. This perspective was supported by anecdotes from residents who discovered their neighbors were already keeping chickens, which shifted their perceptions about the potential noise and odor.

In parallel, the council is navigating the complexities of cannabis regulation. With the state preparing to open its Office of Cannabis Management, there is a pressing need for Lonsdale to establish local ordinances regarding cannabis businesses. Discussions centered on whether to impose a moratorium on cannabis-related activities or to draft zoning regulations that would allow certain types of operations. Concerns about the economic impact were raised, as rejecting cannabis businesses could lead to lost opportunities for local revenue. There was a consensus that a regulatory framework should be established to accommodate the industry while ensuring compliance with legal standards.

Security concerns were also an aspect of the cannabis discussion. The potential for theft, due to the cash-based nature of the cannabis industry under federal banking restrictions, was highlighted. Comparisons were drawn to the challenges faced by liquor stores, with a recognition that public perception may differ from the actual impacts of cannabis businesses. Ultimately, the council seemed inclined towards drafting an ordinance to regulate cannabis operations, with plans to forward the proposal to the Planning and Zoning Board for further consideration.

Beyond these headline issues, the council addressed several other topics related to urban development and infrastructure. There was a discussion about the proposed development of narrower residential lots, which would require the classification as a Planned Unit Development (PUD). Concerns about drainage and the potential for legal ramifications if these issues are not resolved were emphasized. The council also expressed a desire to incorporate public parks and green spaces into new developments, recognizing the importance of amenities to attract families.

Parking regulations were another focal point, particularly in light of a new food truck on Main Street and the potential impact on local businesses. Suggestions for implementing parking time limits were discussed, with an emphasis on promoting dialogue between the city and business owners to find mutually beneficial solutions.

The council also considered the potential development of a water amenity, such as a splash pad, but acknowledged the financial challenges associated with such projects. There were differing opinions on the feasibility and funding models, with some advocating for public-private partnerships to alleviate financial burdens. The importance of transparency regarding existing city debt was underscored, particularly with a planned water tower project in 2028.

Code enforcement issues also surfaced, highlighting the need for consistent application of city codes related to parking and property use. The council recognized the complexities of enforcement, particularly when businesses appear to disregard regulations, and emphasized the importance of educating new homeowners about local codes.

Discussions on infrastructure included the need for proactive planning regarding city projects, notably the water tower and biosolid management, to avoid costly emergency responses. Additionally, a proposed conditional use permit for a car lot with new ownership was examined, alongside concerns about parking solutions for local businesses.

Finally, the council acknowledged the need for addressing demographic changes in the state demographer’s report, as these could impact municipal state aid. Plans for a public hearing on off-street parking and a water storage study were also mentioned.