The board’s primary focus lay on revising the digital signage ordinance. Kristen Russell, acting as a planner, detailed the updates made to the ordinance, which mainly involved clarifying the prohibition of digital billboards and ensuring that freestanding digital signs do not advertise goods or services unavailable on the premises. A key area of concern was the lack of a clear definition for a “digital sign,” which members felt could lead to future disputes. Consequently, the board decided to recommend the ordinance with the addition of a definition for digital signage. The recommendation will be forwarded to the governing body for consideration after a successful motion and vote.

Simultaneously, the board addressed comprehensive changes to the data center ordinance. These adjustments were more extensive than those for digital signage, with significant alterations including moving construction management submission requirements to apply universally, not solely to data centers. This aims to streamline processes across all projects. The board debated parking requirements, presenting two options: one space per employee during maximum shift or one space per 5,000 square feet of gross floor area. Members were encouraged to express their preferences, balancing the need for flexibility and the potential for developers to request fewer spaces if necessary.

Further changes to the data center ordinance involved the removal of well water provisions and the introduction of natural gas feasibility requirements, aligning with existing utility standards. Language was also enhanced regarding cost-sharing agreements for off-site improvements, emphasizing that data center developers should bear the financial responsibility for necessary infrastructure enhancements, thus avoiding community financial burdens. A clarification was made regarding the deletion of full-time non-emergency generator requirements due to duplicative language.

The regulation of non-emergency generator operations sparked discussions, with concerns about potential loopholes in the language. The board debated the use of terms like “full-time” and “regular non-emergency use,” ultimately recommending that non-emergency generator operations be prohibited, except during power outages. Testing of generators, which is legally mandated to occur during specific daytime hours on weekdays, was reaffirmed. The board also stipulated that backup generators be housed within the principal structure or a dedicated accessory structure to mitigate noise.

Parking requirements were another focal point. A member suggested a simplified approach of one space per 5,000 square feet of gross floor area to resolve ongoing litigation issues related to parking. This proposal aimed to allow developers flexibility in requesting fewer parking spaces if justified. The board reached a consensus that while the minimum requirement should not be overly restrictive, developers could provide additional parking if needed.

The meeting also touched on battery energy storage systems, which have garnered interest due to their potential benefits and safety concerns. The board discussed the zoning implications and the need for establishing regulations as the technology evolves. It was noted that if battery storage accompanies solar facilities, it could be treated as accessory equipment, but if it becomes a principal use, zoning considerations are necessary. Members acknowledged the importance of addressing fire safety concerns associated with battery storage technology.