One notable concerns was the definition of substantial off-site impacts, including traffic and noise. The committee debated the necessity of quantifying these impacts, with discussions highlighting the challenges of balancing the interests of agri-tourism operations with those of the surrounding community.

The difficulty of managing parking and traffic during agri-tourism events was another significant topic. Members discussed the adequacy of current local codes and whether new regulations specific to agri-tourism operators should be created. Concerns were raised about the narrow roads in the area, which were not designed for event parking, and the impact of increased traffic on emergency vehicle access.

Noise ordinances were also a concern, with discussions about the need to balance different lifestyles within the community. Members considered the possibility of establishing a voluntary process for agri-tourism operators to exempt themselves from certain regulations by obtaining a business tax receipt. This approach aimed to mitigate complaints and encourage open communication between operators and the community.

The committee also discussed the enforcement of regulations and the implications of staff changes on this process. The need for careful consideration of property classifications for agricultural activities was emphasized, with the recognition that different farms have varying capacities to handle the impacts of agri-tourism.

There was a consensus among the members that state law already provides certain protections for agri-tourism. However, there was debate about the need for additional town ordinances and regulations. Some members believed that existing ordinances and BMPs were sufficient, while others advocated for recommendations to resolve issues related to agri-tourism.

The committee considered linking BMPs to existing ordinances related to being a good neighbor. The idea of becoming a member of the Agri-Tourism Association and displaying the association’s sign on the property was suggested as a signal of compliance with agri-tourism regulations. The importance of a balanced approach to off-site impacts was emphasized to avoid excessive restrictions on agri-tourism activities.

Regarding the town’s code ordinances, there were debates over potential changes to traffic violations, parking, and noise. The committee discussed the possibility of implementing a 24 square foot sign with an electronic display for agri-tourism. Concerns were raised about the potential impact on neighboring properties and the need to consider thresholds for impacts.

The impact of events on traffic was a notable concern, with specific examples such as farm-to-table dinners causing significant congestion. The need for a townwide approach to address traffic issues related to events was discussed, including the suggestion for the town to conduct a study to determine appropriate traffic limits.

The discussion also addressed the broader issue of rule enforcement in the town. Some members expressed frustration about selective enforcement and the changing dynamics due to new residents. There was a call for the committee to make specific recommendations, with a particular focus on updating the noise ordinance.

The meeting concluded with plans to reconvene in two weeks, with an agenda to potentially invite fire rescue to discuss emergency access requirements for agri-tourism. The committee also planned to obtain and review existing agri-tourism ordinances from Miami-Dade for future reference, and the next meeting was scheduled for March 6th.