A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to discussing the proposed RV resort project, which is anticipated to generate substantial revenue for the town. The project, located off Seaw Road, is set to be reviewed by the planning and zoning board, with discussions about its potential impact on local finances. The committee examined three financial options concerning an impact fee structure for the RV resort. The first option proposed a one-time impact fee of $500,000 upon the project’s certificate of occupancy, with an additional recurring payment of $25,000 starting in the third year. The cumulative contributions from the resort were projected to bolster the town’s budget, specifically in road and drainage funding. However, concerns were raised about the project’s financial assumptions, including its projected occupancy rates and the potential strain on town resources, such as public safety services.

Committee members expressed skepticism about the upfront payment, likening it to a bribe, and emphasized the need for a comprehensive evaluation of the project’s costs against its anticipated revenue. They requested further financial information and transparency regarding the project’s long-term viability and its impact on the town’s infrastructure. Discussions also touched on the potential benefits for local businesses and the assurance that the property would not be repurposed for multifamily housing, a declaration deemed essential to maintaining the community’s character.

In parallel to the RV resort discussions, the committee reviewed the town’s annual audit report. The report, presented by the auditors, highlighted the town’s financial position as of September 30, 2024. The audit, conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, found no deficiencies or material weaknesses in internal controls. The auditors emphasized the town’s cooperation during the audit process, which is expected to conclude in the following week.

The audit revealed a general fund balance of approximately $2.5 million, with $1.852 million unassigned. The auditors noted that the town’s financial records were accurate, with all data matching the accounting systems. The committee was assured that no changes to the draft report were anticipated before finalization.

Additionally, the committee engaged in a discussion about the format and detail of financial reports. There was a divergence of opinions regarding the balance between comprehensive detail and concise summaries. Some members advocated for a more succinct report to facilitate easier understanding and decision-making, while others stressed the importance of retaining detailed financial data. A proposal was made to utilize a tool called PowerBI to automate and present financial data more effectively, allowing for comparative analysis over multiple periods.

Further financial discussions included the necessity for budget amendments to address overages in legal fees and the proposed capital improvement budget amendment of $100,000 related to the Transportation Planning Agency. The committee also contemplated the impact of the anticipated end to a local sales tax, which is expected to result in a loss of approximately $335,000 annually.