A point of discussion was the draft of the Rule Vista guidelines, which aimed to preserve the rural character of Loxahatchee Groves by emphasizing sustainability in community design. The council debated several proposed modifications, including the necessity of integrating equestrian amenities with trail connectivity. A concern was raised about potential gaps in the equestrian trail network if developments proceeded without clear connectivity plans. One member questioned the practicality of requiring equestrian amenities in developments lacking proximity to existing or proposed trails. The risk of creating isolated developments disconnected from the trail network was highlighted as an issue.

The discussion also touched on the current phrasing in the development codes regarding equestrian trail connections. The phrase “shall be considered” was deemed too ambiguous, prompting suggestions for stronger requirements. Some members argued for mandatory inclusion of trail connections in developments near existing or proposed trails, while others advocated for developers to justify the absence of such amenities in their plans.

Attention turned to the design and connectivity of proposed trails, with specific emphasis on the west side of canals and Okobe Boulevard. The council recognized the importance of linking non-residential properties with the trail systems and acknowledged that while proposed trails were marked on maps, the feasibility of their development remained uncertain. The need for a cohesive approach to trail connectivity was emphasized.

Alongside the discussions on equestrian amenities, the council debated architectural standards, particularly focusing on roofing styles and parapet walls in commercial projects. The review included examining various roof types and their impact on building design. It was noted that hip roofs, due to their aerodynamic design, manage wind forces more effectively than gable roofs. The debate extended to the inclusion of parapets, traditionally prohibited but considered necessary for screening rooftop equipment in commercial buildings. Members debated whether to allow parapets, provided they enhance the building’s aesthetic with additional design elements.

The council also scrutinized the existing architectural guidelines, particularly regarding the appearance and functionality of commercial façades. Ordinance 2015-07 outlines the need for architectural features that maintain human scale and avoid monotonous designs. The discussion included the importance of porches, with some members expressing a desire to maintain uniformity in architectural language while avoiding conflicting guidelines. Specific examples were cited, such as the design of Tractor Supply, which met existing guidelines but sparked debate over its aesthetic appeal.

Furthermore, the council discussed window design standards, emphasizing the need for individuality in architecture to prevent a uniform “cookie-cutter” appearance. Proposals were made to ensure windows maintain a residential feel, with specific spacing requirements along building facades. The council contemplated codifying these window regulations into a future ordinance, highlighting the need for clear guidelines to promote a cohesive architectural vision.