The most pressing topic discussed was the proposal to hire Jeff Kurt as the town’s in-house attorney. The council deliberated on the financial implications of this transition, comparing it to the current model of retaining outside legal counsel. A key point of contention was the cost associated with this change, including the proposed budget for the in-house legal department, which was estimated at $310,000, with an additional $50,000 allocated for potential outside legal services. However, concerns were raised about the clarity of financial reporting and transparency in legal expenditures.

There was a debate over the necessity and role of a paralegal in supporting the in-house attorney. Questions arose about the paralegal’s billing rate and the overall cost-effectiveness of the in-house model. The council also discussed the potential benefits of having an in-house attorney who could assist other departments, such as code enforcement, and the need for monthly reports detailing legal expenses for better oversight.

The discussion further delved into the contractual provisions for the in-house attorney position, particularly regarding severance. The council debated the implications of including a severance clause, weighing the risks of potential financial liabilities if the contract was terminated early. The attorney present clarified that the maximum severance allowed by law for city government employees was 20 weeks, prompting suggestions for a tiered severance approach based on performance and tenure.

The meeting also addressed broader budgetary concerns, with discussions about the town’s financial planning, property values, and revenue sources. The council examined the potential increase of the millage rate to bolster reserves, despite differing opinions on this proposal. The speaker emphasized the importance of maintaining a reserve fund and preparing for emergencies, highlighting the need for a big-picture perspective in budget planning.

Infrastructure projects and community issues were also on the agenda, with discussions about the transportation fund, solid waste budget, and capital improvement fund. The council explored the challenges of funding essential projects amidst rising costs and inflation. Concerns were raised about the sustainability of the solid waste fund and the need for a long-term funding strategy for capital projects.

The Southern Boulevard corridor and its development were also discussed, with differing opinions on the proposed extension of commercial development and its implications for the town’s financial challenges and preservation of agricultural residential properties. The dialogue underscored the need for further discussions and clarifications regarding the town’s future development and identity.

The council also addressed code enforcement issues, proposing changes to the code enforcement process and discussing the implications for community standards. The adjustments included limitations on how often individuals could appeal for relief from code enforcement liens and established parameters on lien fine reductions.