During the meeting, the board examined the protocol for executive sessions, with a focus on the process for recusal and the importance of confidentiality in these meetings. A debate ensued on whether a recused member should leave the room to prevent undue influence or breach of sensitive information.

In the realm of property taxation, a member brought to light an article discussing the rise in property values and taxes on a national level, prompting a conversation on the implications for local assessments. The board also tackled the challenge of locating property owners for tax matters, weighing the efficacy of internet searches against traditional mailed follow-ups.

The meeting included discussions on the importance of the equalized value, which is recalculated biennially and impacts state aid and county assessments. The significance of this value was underscored as a state-mandated measure to maintain consistency across communities. Additionally, a presentation by an attorney on exemptions and abatements was referenced, with a plan to disperse informational handouts among the board members.

Technical issues with the Munis software were a recurring theme, as members aired grievances over its performance and the impending fiscal year’s billing concerns. A consultant’s visit was planned to specifically address these issues and to ensure accuracy in the forthcoming billing cycle.

Further discussions revolved around the Y2K file, with an explanation requested for its significance. The board underscored the need to rectify billing errors promptly and identified the tax collector as responsible for sending out the bills, emphasizing the necessity for checks and balances in the process.

On the administrative front, the board reviewed and approved various financial documents, including a debit of $18,194.82 and a corresponding credit, unpaid bills, interest, and the high volume of motor vehicle and real estate abatement requests. The meeting also acknowledged the competency of the individual responsible for the meeting minutes of June 3rd.

Lastly, the board contemplated the implications of a car transferred between individuals post the owner’s death on excise taxes. They also discussed the upcoming neighborhood review team meeting, described as a “meet and greet” session, and the launch of a new website, noting the need for thorough content review.