One of the most contentious issues of the meeting was the proposed $50,000 road expansion in the Upper North Cemetery. A member of the public, John Bowen, vocalized strong opposition, criticizing the absence of a detailed topography map or comprehensive plan. Bowen argued that simply laying down a road without proper planning failed to address the cemetery’s needs. Instead, he proposed reallocating funds for electrical installations to enhance the cemetery’s utility, such as lighting flagpoles and veteran plaques, potentially paving the way for future developments like plumbing or sprinkler systems. Bowen’s plea to the committee was to adopt a “no plan, no money” stance on the road expansion and to consider his electrical proposal, which he believed was more viable and thoroughly discussed.

The meeting also highlighted concerns about the appropriate use of reserve funds. Dave Pacios, speaking remotely, stressed the importance of reserving these funds for genuine emergencies rather than using them to cover routine departmental budget shortfalls. His comments underscored the need for fiscal responsibility, emphasizing that such funds should not be treated as a general budgetary safety net, especially with a quarter of the fiscal year remaining.

Further discourse unfolded around a request for a $12,000 reserve fund transfer to cover unexpected overages in the fire department’s vehicle maintenance budget. The chief explained that urgent repairs were needed for the primary ambulance, with estimated costs for diesel particulate filter and exhaust gas recirculating valve repairs around $10,000. The vehicle maintenance line, with approximately $7,900 remaining, was deemed insufficient, primarily covering fuel and minor repairs.

The meeting also delved into financial strategies, particularly concerning the proposed $500,000 transfer of free cash to the Lunenburg public schools for FY26, contingent upon the failure of a Proposition 2½ override. The select board recommended approval, but the committee expressed the need for further dialogue on the utilization of these funds. Transparency and public awareness were deemed critical, with suggestions for the school to present spending plans at the forthcoming town meeting to meet charter goals and secure public trust.

The session further addressed the implications of a budget increase projected between FY25 and FY26, estimated at $4,282,000 or a 17.21% rise. Concerns were raised about discrepancies in reported full-time equivalent employees and the lack of detailed budget documentation from the School Committee. The Finance Committee, positioned as the fiscal watchdog for the town, discussed the necessity of a thorough analysis of historical data to ensure a well-structured budgeting process.

The committee’s deliberations also touched on municipal debt strategies, with debates on excludable versus regular debt. A particular focus was on the Marshall Park projects, which faced potential financial challenges due to nearing the 11% excludable debt limit. Members examined the implications of project timing, bond issuance, and the broader impact on the town’s financial health.