The meeting commenced with a public hearing on the fiscal year 2026 tax levy, where Principal Assessor Linda Chaikica presented detailed insights into the town’s property tax structure. The assessed value for Lunenburg was noted to be approximately $2.4 billion, with residential properties comprising 91% of this total. The assessor’s comprehensive overview included the fiscal year 2026 tax classification, potential exemptions, and the implications of a split tax rate, which could have altered tax burdens between residential and commercial properties.

Discussion focused on the implications of adopting a split tax rate, which would shift more of the tax burden onto commercial properties. A chart illustrated various scenarios, showing that a maximum shift could lower the residential tax rate to $13.70 while raising the commercial tax rate to $21.58, potentially increasing commercial tax bills by $2,300.36. This prospect raised concerns about the feasibility and impact on Lunenburg’s economic health, given the town’s low commercial valuation.

Public commentary included input from a resident who advocated for split tax rates. However, the same resident questioned the sustainability of the town’s existing deferral program without increased commercial taxes. In response, the board highlighted that raising commercial tax rates could risk driving small businesses away, which would be detrimental to Lunenburg’s economy. Ultimately, board members agreed with the Board of Assessors’ recommendation to maintain a single tax rate, concluding that enhancing the commercial base first would be prudent before considering any tax rate shifts.

In a unanimous vote, the board decided to adopt a single tax rate and not implement any proposed exemptions such as a residential exemption, open space discount, or small commercial exemption. These exemptions were deemed unsuitable for Lunenburg’s demographic and commercial profile. The residential exemption, for instance, was dismissed as it would shift tax burdens from moderately valued homes to higher-valued and non-owner-occupied residences, which did not align with the town’s current needs.

The meeting also delved into public comments unrelated to the tax levy. Ron Delio expressed frustration with a finance committee public hearing on warrant articles for a special town meeting, which he described as poorly executed and sparsely attended. Delio recounted difficulties accessing the town hall and criticized the absence of select board members and sponsors to address public inquiries. His comments urged the board to reflect on the planning and logistics of public hearings.

Another resident, David W. Rogers, raised concerns about overlooked financial charges from Fitchburg, advocating for a review of the town’s accounting processes. He emphasized the importance of maintaining positive relations with neighboring towns and called for auditors to clarify how these charges were missed, describing the oversight as embarrassing.