One of the central topics was the fee structure for new sewer connections associated with ADUs. The consensus was to treat these connections similarly to those for a typical house, emphasizing the necessity of a distinct connection fee along with an ADU fee. This approach aims to ensure accurate measurement and billing of sewage volume, maintaining a fair system for all homeowners. The commission also clarified that ADUs must connect to the existing sewer line on the property. This requirement avoids unnecessary street connections, emphasizing the responsibility of homeowners to maintain their lines from the property to the main sewer line.

The commission explored the intricacies of billing for properties with ADUs, particularly when multiple water meters are involved. The discussion touched on whether the tenant’s name should appear on the sewer bill alongside the property owner’s name. While the commission leaned towards billing the property owner primarily, including tenants’ names was seen as a way to enhance accountability, especially if tenants fail to pay their share. However, the ultimate responsibility would remain with the property owner.

As the conversation progressed, the commission considered the broader implications of ADU regulations. This included examining how existing septic systems would integrate with the sewer system, particularly in areas serviced by sewers but still using septic systems. The potential for property value impacts was acknowledged, with members recognizing that tying both the main house and ADU to the main line might be more cost-effective than separate permits.

Easements emerged as another topic, with a consensus that exceptions would not be granted lightly. The commission maintained a firm stance against allowing easements unless under specific emergency circumstances, although there were calls to broaden the definition of emergencies to accommodate unforeseen situations. This stance aims to maintain the integrity of the sewer system while allowing some flexibility for unique cases.

A broader discussion on ADU policy highlighted the need for a comprehensive document to be presented to the town council for approval. The meeting acknowledged that the first ADU permit application had been submitted, signaling a growing interest in this type of housing, which the commission anticipates will lead to a rise in applications once the first ADU begins construction.

In addition to the primary focus on ADUs, the commission addressed other issues like manhole repairs and a unique billing situation on Riley Road. A discrepancy arose due to a water meter change, prompting the commission to approve a credit adjustment for the homeowner. This decision underscored the commission’s attention to detail and commitment to resolving billing issues fairly.

Looking ahead, the commission outlined future meeting agendas, continuing to prioritize ADUs as a significant item. Discussions on manhole repairs and easement waivers are also expected, with two parties already expressing interest in seeking waivers. Additionally, a property previously occupied by a Dollar Tree is set to become a gym, requiring the commission to vote on the flow and associated charges for this new business.