The task force emphasized the need for a stormwater utility to ensure that all property owners contribute fairly to managing stormwater impacts. However, there was recognition of the challenges this poses for property owners who have already invested in stormwater mitigation measures. Task force members debated the logistics of providing credits for such property owners, acknowledging the staffing limitations that would complicate billing and enforcement. Concerns were raised about the responsibility falling on the Department of Public Works (DPW) to manage initial billing without dedicated personnel to assess properties for stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs).

Examples of local properties with significant stormwater mitigation investments were cited, including a new warehouse designed to manage runoff effectively. Task force members anticipated resistance from property owners when assessing utility fees based on impervious areas, particularly given the town’s limited capacity to enforce private maintenance plans. The task force recognized the need for a balanced approach that considers all property owners’ contributions and responsibilities while addressing concerns about fairness and equity in billing practices.

In addition to the ongoing stormwater management projects, discussions highlighted the importance of maintaining effective stormwater systems through proper maintenance and operation. Concerns were raised about the qualifications required for overseeing stormwater inspections and maintenance. The task force considered the potential need for additional certifications or the hiring of a consultant to ensure effective management. The costs associated with maintaining catch basins and detention basins were noted as a deterrent for municipalities to perform necessary inspections and cleanings. The idea of contracting these tasks out to improve maintenance was proposed, though its feasibility was questioned.

The possibility of offering incentives to property owners for maintaining their stormwater systems was also discussed, such as providing abatements for documented compliance with maintenance requirements. However, the financial impact on the stormwater utility was a concern, particularly regarding larger contributors like industrial properties. The task force acknowledged the importance of community education about stormwater systems, emphasizing the need for public understanding and engagement.

The meeting included a public comment period during which a resident named Anna raised questions about the transparency and process of awarding the contract to Weston and Samson. Anna expressed concern over the lack of competitive bidding and stressed the importance of public education regarding the new stormwater utility. She urged the task force to hold informational meetings to explain the utility’s rationale and garner public support. The task force confirmed that public education is part of Weston and Samson’s scope of work, with plans for meetings to engage the community and provide updates.