The board’s primary concern was the rising PFOA levels, which exceeded regulatory limits. Well number one recorded 4.94 parts per trillion, surpassing the acceptable threshold of 4.0. Well number five also failed, with PFOA levels of 4.46 parts per trillion and total PFAS levels at 9.58 parts per trillion. The board discussed the operational challenges posed by these findings, particularly for well number four, which struggles with capacity issues. Board members noted the potential need for a $17 million treatment plant investment, primarily for one well.

The board also addressed the possibility of purchasing water from neighboring districts. However, discussions on this front remained inconclusive, as ongoing talks had not yet resulted in a resolution. The complexities of connecting with another town’s water supply and uncertainties regarding future pricing were key considerations.

Another topic was the potential imposition of water restrictions due to the drought. The board acknowledged the critical state of the water supply, highlighting that recent snowfall was insufficient for groundwater recharge. As a result, restrictions on outdoor water use might be necessary in the spring if conditions do not improve.

Financial discussions included the fiscal year 2025-2026 budget, which accounted for standard operational costs and debt obligations. The board projected a 20% increase in health insurance due to staffing changes and market conditions. A motion was made to accept the maintenance and operating budget, which totaled $2,080,930.22 after recalculations. The board considered the necessity of temporary staffing to support ongoing projects, with suggestions to increase salary allocations to accommodate a potential temporary hire.

The board also reviewed and proposed amendments to the Water District’s rules and regulations regarding water service line responsibilities. Following a recent Department of Public Health survey, the board sought to clarify who is responsible for repairing lead service lines, despite the district reporting no such lines. The proposed amendments would designate the district as responsible for repairs on their side if future regulations deem certain materials unacceptable, while homeowners would remain responsible for their respective portions.

In addition to regulatory discussions, the meeting covered a water bill dispute from a resident on Butter Lane. The resident reported unusually high bills since May 2023, with a significant spike in October 2023. The board installed a logging meter in November 2024, which revealed a dramatic reduction in usage. The board deliberated on the possibility of undetected leaks within the resident’s plumbing, despite her claims of not using irrigation. The resident expressed frustration, feeling the board attributed her high bills to irrigation without definitive proof.

The meeting also touched on maintenance and infrastructure issues, including hydrant fees and the condition of fire hydrants throughout the district. Concerns were raised about the accessibility of hydrants, with many being obstructed by overgrown landscaping or buried. The board acknowledged the need for systematic evaluations and replacements, as older hydrants have parts that are no longer available. A reassessment of the hydrant fee structure was considered necessary due to rising dispatching costs.

Additionally, a bill from a resident, JB Turf, was debated. The bill related to the repair of sprinkler lines damaged during a water line installation near his property. The board ultimately decided not to cover the expense, concluding that the responsibility for installations within the state right-of-way lies with the property owner.