The commission’s primary focus was the stormwater fee structure, with Stantech presenting two scenarios to stabilize the utility’s finances. Scenario one proposed a 70% fee increase by fiscal year 2026, raising revenues to approximately $3 million annually, while scenario two suggested a more moderate 50% increase, incorporating additional tax revenue. The latter was favored for balancing financial stability with customer affordability. A critical aspect of the presentation was the current disproportionate three-tier billing system, where a large first tier encompassed 52% of parcels. Stantech recommended recalibrating these tiers to reflect the average impervious area of properties more accurately, proposing a shift from the existing billing unit of 3,700 square feet to an equivalent residential unit of 2,800 square feet. The proposed changes aimed not just to increase tiers but to ensure fees proportionally reflected stormwater contributions from different properties.

Discussions highlighted financial implications, particularly for smaller parcels, and emphasized the need for a sustainable reserve for unexpected repairs or emergencies. Commissioner Peebles acknowledged conducting his own analysis. The commission was set to engage in further discussions, focusing on community impacts and sustainable operations.

The meeting also addressed a proposed development by Mela Enterprises, which sparked considerable public concern over fire protection, flooding, and traffic safety. Residents expressed apprehension about the adequacy of fire hydrant flow rates, with a study indicating insufficient capacity for fire protection. Concerns over flood elevation compliance and existing stormwater management issues were raised, with the development site recently designated as a flood zone requiring significant elevation adjustments. Public commentary also highlighted traffic safety issues, with fears that the development could exacerbate existing traffic conditions, especially on narrow roads.

Wildlife protection was another focal point, with residents citing the presence of bald eagles and other wildlife in the proposed development area. The development team countered that the property was not designated as a conservation area, arguing that wildlife presence did not preclude development. Traffic safety concerns were echoed by several residents, who cited dangerous conditions already present in the area and the potential for increased vehicle volumes exacerbating these issues.

The commission debated the development proposal, with one commissioner expressing the need for decisions based on evidence rather than sentiment. The motion to approve the development order failed to pass, but an alternative motion to approve it contingent upon county approval of road standards was successful, addressing some of the previous concerns.

In other business, the commission addressed issues related to stormwater billing methodologies, considering the feasibility of a flat fee system versus the tiered approach. Concerns about vacant land assessments and the effectiveness of using Community Redevelopment Agency funds for drainage improvements were discussed, with suggestions to incentivize property owners to manage stormwater on their own properties.

Furthermore, the commission considered the possibility of permitting alcohol consumption at private events on city property, with public feedback sought to guide decision-making. The meeting concluded with unanimous approval for the installation of traffic calming devices on 24th Street.