During the meeting, several speakers expressed their discontent with Chief Remy’s actions and the broader issues surrounding the police department’s morale and operations. Vicki Williams criticized Chief Remy’s judgment, both on and off duty, stating, “I have no trust in him to run a fair and just Police Department for our city.” This sentiment was echoed by Jerry Parker, who cited a poll where 615 participants believed Chief Remy should be fired, with only 12 in disagreement. Parker highlighted a quote from City Manager Vicky Gainer, indicating that any further lapses in judgment by Remy would not be tolerated, pointing out that numerous past violations had already occurred.

James Finch, a long-time resident, shared personal anecdotes about financial mismanagement within the city and his experiences during a medical emergency. Finch’s comments pointed to broader concerns about the city’s governance and the commission’s ability to address issues effectively. David Karti Reyes added to the discussion by expressing his fears regarding living conditions in the city and dissatisfaction with how the commission had handled certain situations, particularly regarding Chief Remy.

Katherine Hudson discussed Chief Remy’s no contest plea related to leaving the scene of an accident, arguing that his actions violated Florida law and questioned his moral character. Hudson appealed for the commission to reconsider Chief Remy’s position, stressing that the community deserved a leader who embodied high standards of legal and moral conduct. Michelle Carter, although not a Lynn Haven resident, voiced support for Commissioner Jamie Warrick and echoed the call for Chief Remy’s removal, expressing concern that the police department’s morale was at stake.

The meeting also saw discussions about the legal and procedural concerns surrounding the termination of employees due to medical conditions. An attorney addressed the commission, explaining that terminating an employee based on an incident attributed to a medical condition could violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This legal guidance influenced the commission’s decision-making process, with some members expressing disagreement with the advice.

In addition to public commentary, the commission discussed several key administrative matters. The city manager provided a report highlighting recent activities, including budget meetings with the commissioners and an upcoming Finance Review Committee meeting. She also mentioned the anticipated arrival of a new clock for The Old City Hall and commended the police department on a pre-audit for accreditation that had received positive feedback from auditors.

The commission debated a proposed resolution to amend the fee schedule related to utility rates. The finance director presented details about upcoming fee increases, including a rise in water and sewer rates. This discussion reflected ongoing adjustments in city services and the financial implications for residents.

A quasijudicial hearing regarding a development order for a multi-tenant shared infrastructure project was also on the agenda. The application aimed to construct stormwater facilities necessary for a proposed Circle K gas station and future developments on the site. The Planning Commission had previously recommended approval of the project by a 4 to 1 vote.

The commissioners also touched on proposed amendments to the Unified Land Development Code, specifically regarding accessory structures in residential zones. Suggestions included requiring restrictions such as ensuring that any structure must be strapped down for safety, the presence of a privacy fence at least six feet high, and adherence to setback requirements.