The most notable discussion revolved around variance applications for properties at 13212 and Bokea Avenue, heavily impacted by Hurricane Helen. The applications requested adjustments to setbacks and structure coverage due to the properties’ non-conforming lot sizes and historical zoning constraints. Andrew Morris, the city’s long-range planner, explained that the existing duplexes on these lots suffered considerable damage, allowing the owners to utilize section 110-96 for rebuilding on non-conforming lots. Morris emphasized that the variances would align the properties with Florida building codes and FEMA requirements while maintaining the neighborhood’s character. The requested changes included reducing the side setback to 5 feet, the rear setback to 12 feet, and front setback to 15 feet, alongside increasing structure coverage from 40% to 50%. The city’s recommendation was to approve the variances, as no public objections were recorded.

Following the variance discussions, the meeting addressed several code enforcement issues, with a notable case concerning a property on Bay Point Drive. The property exhibited significant storm damage, with missing roofing material and blown-out windows. Code compliance supervisor Holden Pinker testified that a courtesy notice of violation had been issued, followed by a formal notice after non-compliance. Despite attempts to contact the property owner, no response was received, and the property remained in violation. The magistrate ruled that the property owner must comply within 30 days or face a $250 daily fine, a decision supported by public testimony highlighting ongoing neighborhood concerns.

Another case involved a property on Miramar Avenue, where unpermitted construction work prompted a code violation notice. Despite the absence of representatives from the property owner, DNR Realty and Estates LLC, the city presented evidence of remodeling work that exceeded $500, requiring a permit. The magistrate determined the property was in violation and mandated compliance within 30 days, with a $250 daily fine for continued non-compliance.

Additionally, the meeting considered a case on Golf Lane, where storm damage had left the property in disrepair. The city had issued a courtesy notice, followed by a formal violation notice after the owner failed to comply. The magistrate ordered the property owner to either secure a remodel permit or demolish the structure within 30 days, subject to a daily fine for non-compliance.

The meeting also reviewed an affidavit of compliance for a property on North Bayshore Drive, which had subsequently met the requirements, closing the case without a fine. Meanwhile, a property on West Parsley Drive requested an extension for compliance regarding a damaged dock. The magistrate granted an extension to August 6, 2025, considering the ongoing repair efforts.