A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to the recommendations from the climate action committee, which aimed to enhance the borough’s sustainability efforts. The committee proposed several initiatives, including the expansion of the utility rebate program to incentivize solar installations, particularly targeting residential uptake of rooftop solar. The committee also suggested the possibility of developing a solar carport in the public safety parking lot, which would provide dual benefits of vehicle shade and electricity generation.

One of the more ambitious initiatives discussed was the potential lifting of the cap on solar photovoltaic (PV) array sizes within the borough. The committee believes that consulting with an energy economics specialist could help navigate the complexities of larger solar installations, balancing electricity generation with the revenue derived from electricity sales. Additionally, the committee recommended enhancing public awareness and participation in energy-saving programs, which would include upgrading metering infrastructure to allow commercial accounts to access time-of-use billing. Despite the challenges posed by the existing billing and software systems, there was a consensus that the borough should leverage its smart meters to maximize the benefits of the current system.

The meeting also addressed community concerns regarding gas-powered leaf blowers. Residents voiced significant frustration over the noise and pollution caused by these machines. Complaints highlighted the health risks associated with prolonged exposure to the fumes, with one resident emphasizing the need for operators to wear respirators due to the oil these blowers burn. The council acknowledged the potential benefits of transitioning to battery-powered alternatives, which were claimed to perform as well as, if not better than, gas models. However, some residents noted practical challenges with battery-powered equipment, such as longer recharge times and lower power output compared to gas models.

The council discussed the enforcement of existing regulations on leaf blower usage, particularly concerning the early morning operation hours that disturb residents. Suggestions were made to implement a phased approach to regulating leaf blower usage, potentially involving time restrictions instead of an outright ban. The dialogue underscored a need for broader community conversations regarding the environmental impacts of gas-powered leaf blowers and the exploration of alternative, less harmful practices.

Infrastructure projects were another focal point of the meeting. The council reviewed the borough’s five-year capital plan, which outlines funding for road reconstruction and overlay projects. The Shady Lawn Drive project was highlighted as a priority, with plans ready to bid in February and a $500,000 local aid grant contingent on successful completion. Additionally, the council discussed the Madison A and Danforth intersection improvements, emphasizing the need for innovative enhancements to ensure pedestrian safety amid upcoming developments.

The council also addressed the Elmer Street parking lot, with preliminary design services scheduled for next year. The discussion touched on potential challenges in developing the lot due to private land ownership issues, which could complicate the construction of a parking deck. The need for cooperation from private landowners was emphasized to advance any such plans.

Public comments during the meeting reflected diverse community interests, including opposition to potential rental housing developments at Drew University. Concerns were raised about the integrity of the university and the implications of a possible settlement allowing for 300 to 400 new apartment units on campus. Residents urged the council to resist supporting such developments, stressing the importance of preserving the university’s character and campus environment.