Manchester-By-The-Sea Debates Traffic and Safety Concerns in Union Street Development
- Meeting Overview:
During the recent Manchester-By-The-Sea Select Board meeting, discussions focused on a proposed development on Union Street, which aims to transform a single retail space into a combination of three residential units and up to three retail spaces. The project has been a focal point for the board due to the implications for community safety, traffic flow, and zoning compliance. Particular attention was given to the potential traffic concerns arising from the development, with board members emphasizing the need for clear guidelines to ensure that the project aligns with safety standards and community expectations.
The proposal to convert the existing property on Union Street from a single retail unit into a mixed-use building with additional retail and residential spaces raised several safety and traffic concerns. The board deliberated on the implications of increased traffic flow, particularly the challenges posed by the existing driveway, which is currently non-conforming and poses safety hazards for both pedestrians and vehicles. The board emphasized the importance of ensuring clear sight lines and maintaining proper safety measures, such as the installation of safety signage and a subsurface snow melt system, to mitigate risks associated with the proposed development.
The Select Board also discussed the necessity for conditions to accompany the project’s approval. These conditions included restricting commercial deliveries during peak summer hours to alleviate congestion and ensuring that the driveway is used solely for access, thereby prohibiting recreational activities that could further compromise safety. Additionally, the board required that the applicant implement landscaping measures to maintain visibility and install a fire department connection or hydrant as part of the safety enhancements.
Despite these conditions, concerns remained about the adequacy of the proposed traffic management solutions. Some board members questioned the validity of the traffic impact study presented by the applicant, which claimed a projected reduction in vehicle trips. Skepticism was expressed regarding the study’s conclusions, with some participants arguing that the increase in retail space could, in fact, lead to a rise in traffic, contrary to the report’s findings.
Further complicating the discussion was the ambiguity surrounding the project’s layout and design, particularly the dimensions and consistency of the proposed building’s floors. The lack of clarity in the plans prompted calls for additional documentation and revisions to ensure that all details were accurately represented, including the width of the driveway and the alignment of the residential and retail spaces.
The board ultimately approved the special permit for the development, contingent upon meeting the specified conditions and receiving planning board approval for the residential units. This approval included a variance to allow the construction of a three-story building, justified by the unique topography and existing ledge conditions that limited expansion options. However, the board maintained that any changes to the approved plans would require the applicant to return for further review, emphasizing the need for ongoing oversight as the development progresses.
In addition to the primary focus on the Union Street development, the board also addressed other applications during the meeting. Notably, the board reviewed a proposal for a single-story addition and rear deck at Three Eaglehead Road, which sought a special permit due to the non-conforming nature of the lot. The board approved this application, concluding that the proposed changes would not adversely affect the neighborhood and would accommodate the homeowners’ need for additional living space.
A continued public hearing for the application concerning a change of use for a structure from retail to a mix of retail and residential at another location was also part of the meeting’s agenda. Discussions centered on the procedural integrity of submitted materials and the potential impact on traffic and neighborhood dynamics. The board considered feedback from concerned citizens and emphasized the importance of thorough evaluation before making a decision.
Gregory Federspiel
City Council Officials:
Ann Harrison, John Round, Becky Jaques, Catherine Bilotta, Brian Sollosy, Debbie Powers (Executive Assistant to the Town Administrator and Select Board)
-
Meeting Type:
City Council
-
Committee:
-
Meeting Date:
12/17/2025
-
Recording Published:
12/18/2025
-
Duration:
165 Minutes
-
Notability Score:
Routine
Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:
-
State:
Massachusetts
-
County:
Essex County
-
Towns:
Manchester-By-The-Sea
Recent Meetings Nearby:
- 12/18/2025
- 12/19/2025
- 45 Minutes
- 12/18/2025
- 12/18/2025
- 47 Minutes
- 12/18/2025
- 12/19/2025
- 33 Minutes