The Gates family property has been under scrutiny, with a court previously granting an extension until June 9 for improvements to be completed. Despite this, no progress had been observed, leading to the board’s decision to consider legal action. Receivership would involve appointing a court receiver to manage and execute the necessary repairs, with costs billed to the Gates family, who risk losing their property if unable to pay. The board emphasized the need for tangible evidence of progress, such as signed contracts, to avoid the severe measure of receivership.

During the meeting, there was a detailed exchange between the board and family members. Michael Gates, a family representative, contended that they had been in contact with contractors, although no contracts had been signed. He attributed delays to challenges like frozen pipes, leaks, and personal family health issues, which had compounded their difficulties. The board pushed for more definitive action, stressing the urgency of addressing the water issue, a primary concern under state law for habitability.

The implications of this case extend beyond just the Gates family.

Aside from the pressing matter of the Gates property, the board also engaged with other topics. Discussions included the appointment of a new member to the Council on Aging (COA) amidst demographic shifts in the town, where 32% of the population is over 60. This appointment was seen as vital for enhancing community engagement with seniors and addressing their evolving needs.

Another financial matter was the discussion around a bond anticipation note worth $1 million. This was part of a larger financial plan to address water and sewer projects totaling $4.1 million. The board expressed satisfaction with the bond’s favorable rate and discussed strategies to manage the bond through capital assessments.

The board also tackled proposed changes to health insurance contributions for retirees, debating adjustments to align retiree contributions with those of active employees. The proposal suggested revising the contribution rate for Medicare-eligible retirees from a 75/25 split to 70/30, sparking debates over fairness and the financial implications for retirees.

In addition, the meeting covered the town’s flag policy, specifically a request from the Manchester by the Sea Museum to fly the Forester flag for the 250th anniversary of the American Revolution. The board passed a motion to approve the request, emphasizing the need for public communication to clarify the flag’s historical significance.

The Select Board also deliberated on the challenges and logistics of hybrid meeting formats, seeking to balance the convenience of remote participation with the necessity of effective public engagement. Concerns over technical issues and the need for clear protocols were voiced, with suggestions to allow applicants to opt for in-person meetings to ensure comprehensive participation.

The board discussed the need for attendance verification in committee appointments and navigated logistical considerations for trash collection amidst ongoing negotiations with service vendors.