The most prominent topic was the proposed redevelopment of a deteriorating building on Union Street. The project aims to transform the existing structure, previously known as the Cargo Unlimited building, into a mixed-use development with residential and commercial spaces. This proposal includes constructing a new building that maintains the historic facade while addressing significant structural issues such as leaks and disrepair. The plan also seeks to enhance the streetscape’s integrity and improve pedestrian experiences along Union Street.

A major focus of the discussion was the need for a height variance, as the proposed building would exceed the 35-foot height limit and the allowed two-and-a-half stories. The developers emphasized that the new design would maintain commercial space on the first floor and include six parking spaces for residential units. The architectural team assured that the design aligns with community feedback and retains the building’s historic aesthetic while modernizing its functionality.

Community members and board members raised concerns about the increased density and potential traffic and safety implications. Safety improvements, such as widening the driveway from 10 to 12 feet, were highlighted as ways to mitigate these concerns. However, some attendees called for a traffic study to ensure the development does not exacerbate existing parking and safety issues in the area. The meeting concluded with a decision to continue the public hearing, allowing further exploration of these concerns.

In addition to the Union Street project, the board discussed applications for large accessory dwelling units (ADUs). One application sought to convert a two-car garage into a large ADU on Norwood A, exceeding the standard size limit but conforming to the new bylaw for larger ADUs. The board considered the applicant’s request for dimensional relief, which would allow the ADU to be slightly repositioned on the lot.

A second ADU application involved a request for a variance and special permit to construct a large ADU in district D1, where such units are currently not permitted. The board explored alternatives, including reducing the ADU’s size or proposing an amendment to the bylaw at the upcoming town meeting. This conversation highlighted the challenges of balancing individual property needs with regulatory frameworks and community concerns.

Concerns about safety, aesthetics, and the impact on community resources were central themes as the board navigated these issues. The meeting concluded with the decision to revisit these applications and proposals in future sessions, allowing time for further deliberation and community input.