One of the key points of discussion was the proposed changes to the town’s zoning regulations, which are being updated to meet the state-mandated density requirements for areas near MBTA stations. The task force scrutinized the model used to calculate density, noting discrepancies that could lead to an overestimation. The accuracy of lot sizes was also debated, particularly in relation to the state’s data versus local measurements.

The task force considered amendments to the special permit bylaw, which would affect several properties. Furthermore, they examined potential changes to the downtown area’s appearance, expressing the necessity to ensure any development aligns with community preferences. This led to discussions about the creation of a formal design review committee to better liaise between architects, the community, and developers.

Members discussed the intricacies of the zoning language, emphasizing the importance of clarity and consistency to avoid reliance on underlying zoning requirements. Adjustments to district maps and zoning parameters, including the addition of subdistricts, were reviewed to ensure they met the state-imposed density mandates. The task force also considered adding clarifications to the zoning table for unit counts on two-acre lots and discussed imposing maximum units per lot in certain districts.

The potential implementation of a multi-family overlay on age-restricted properties was deliberated, with concerns raised about protecting existing age-restricted units. The task force also tackled the measurement of building height in hilly areas.

A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to discussing the inclusion of design guidelines in the zoning regulations and the possibility of establishing a design review board. While there were concerns about adding another layer of review, some members argued for the benefits it could bring, such as fostering better architectural design and maintaining the character of the downtown and other districts.

Moreover, the task force addressed the issue of special permit requirements, debating the impact of overlay zoning on environmental regulations, specifically water resources protection. Members sought to understand how the overlay zoning would interplay with these regulations and whether exemptions or special permits would be necessary.

Another newsworthy element was the task force’s deliberation on the feasibility study for achieving 20% affordability in town developments. The decision to authorize the town to enter into an agreement with a consulting firm for this study led to some resistance due to concerns over the timeline, funding, and selection process. The task force voted to move forward with the study.

The meeting also included updates on communication efforts, such as public information sessions and an upcoming joint planning board and task force meeting. There was a suggestion to involve the select board in the meeting to help new members quickly come up to speed with the ongoing discussions.