The visioning project for downtown Manchester was a significant topic of discussion. The board reviewed a proposal to engage a consultant for a comprehensive visioning session, aimed at crafting a plan for business and residential development, zoning, and streetscape design. The project intends to gather feedback from various stakeholders, including business owners, residents, and the chamber of commerce, to envision a vibrant downtown with filled storefronts. The board discussed a budget of $7,000 for the consultant, with a possibility of applying for a One Stop grant to expand planning efforts beyond the downtown area. The board emphasized the importance of focusing on creating a vibrant downtown rather than merely addressing technical issues like parking, which had already been studied. The proposal was approved, with the board agreeing to authorize a contract for the consultant services.

The meeting also addressed erosion control measures for a construction project, with Tom Saxs from Hancock Associates presenting an updated plan. Saxs proposed using straw bales and silk fences to manage runoff and prevent erosion, alongside a construction entrance to minimize debris transport. The board discussed the responsibilities of monitoring these measures, noting that the site contractor would oversee inspections following significant rainfall events. Questions arose about the stormwater permit submission to the Department of Public Works, with Saxs acknowledging the need to consider drainage options for extreme weather events.

Another focal point was the ANR application for a property on Union Street, which proposed dividing a lot into two parcels. Concerns were raised about the legality of creating non-buildable lots, with a board member emphasizing the need for clear criteria in the application documents. After extensive discussion, the board endorsed the plan, with the applicant thanking the board for their patience. The endorsement required recording at town hall.

In addition, the board revisited an ANR application for a property on Ashland Avenue, initially denied without prejudice. The board focused on ensuring clarity and completeness in application documents to minimize future confusion.

The meeting concluded with discussions on proposed changes to accessory dwelling unit regulations. Members debated simplifying language to enhance clarity and flexibility for property owners. There was agreement on allowing a single driveway entrance without restrictions on existing driveways, provided compliance with public works standards.