The Reed Park project, presented by Fos Engineering, proposes an expansion of the existing floating dock system to enhance waterfront access and provide additional dockage for recreational and law enforcement vessels. Designed to meet the conditions of a state boating infrastructure grant, the project includes maintaining clearance to protect the marine environment and creating a walkable connection between Reed and Masconomo Parks. This expansion is expected to generate revenue, yet it sparked debate among the board members and public regarding the allocation of space and the potential disruption to the area’s commercial fishing heritage. Questions were raised about the design specifics, including mooring placements and the impact on commercial fishing.

The conversation then shifted to the proposal for 30-foot finger piers at the fisherman’s dock, intended to accommodate fishing boats currently on moorings. The board scrutinized the visual and parking impacts of the new pilings and the increased fishing activity at Masconomo Park. Further discussions involved the Tux Point public dock facility project, which aims to replace a timber structure with a steel one and raise its elevation by five feet to prepare for sea level rise. The board’s focus here was on ADA compliance, aesthetic preservation, and the feasibility of reconstructing the existing rotunda.

Utility and security for these sites also formed a part of the discussions. The board reviewed water, sewer, gas, and electric services, including emergency generators and the elevation of essential equipment to mitigate flood risks. They also discussed the integration of sustainable practices such as solar panels, geothermal fields, and the treatment of runoff to protect local fisheries.

The impact of construction activities on the local community was another focal point. Concerns were voiced about the noise from blasting and hammering, and there was a proposal to begin construction at 6:30 am to avoid conflicts with school traffic, a change that could affect nearby residents due to the noise of early morning pile driving. The ecological assessment of the site was another area of interest, highlighting the need to manage the diverse habitats found in the area, including the protection of bird species and the management of invasive plant species.

Furthermore, the board tackled the landscaping aspect of the developments, with discussions on the use of native plant materials and the establishment period for irrigation. The possibility of using a water harvesting system to reduce dependence on municipal water supply was proposed. The board also broached the subject of tree protection during construction and the need for clear plans regarding construction activities, parking, and the management of equipment and materials.

In terms of community involvement, public comments were welcomed, with residents expressing their appreciation for the board’s work and raising concerns about construction impacts and electric vehicle safety. The board directed these concerns to the appropriate authorities, maintaining a focus on the landscaping and site development specifics at hand.

Finally, the board considered a waiver request for soil planting depth. Additional documentation was requested regarding screening from the highway and landscaping plans, including shade tree placement. The stormwater management system also underwent scrutiny, with the board highlighting discrepancies in the plans and calculations and the need for further test pits and documentation.