The harbor project discussions revolved around its scale, with some board members worried about the resulting congestion and the use of town resources. The impact on pedestrian access, additional seating areas, and the nighttime environment due to proposed lighting were also debated. The select board backed the project, citing the potential advantages for community accessibility and economic benefits for businesses. During the public comments, there was a mix of opposition and support, with some community members requesting more detailed information on the materials, lighting, and visual renderings to fully understand the project’s impact.

The board also engaged in discussions on the financial aspects, including costs related to water and electricity usage and how these would influence net revenue.

Another area of intense scrutiny was the installation of a sidewalk on Atwater Avenue. The board and traffic consultants weighed the feasibility against safety concerns, considering the road’s limited width and surrounding wetlands. Traffic calming measures, such as rumble strips and road striping, were suggested as alternatives to sidewalks. However, potential dangers to bicycle riders from rumble strips and the need for improved roadway lighting for cyclists were concerns that needed further evaluation.

On infrastructure, the board discussed third-party inspections for structural elements and site work as part of the building permit process. The need for an inspector to represent the town during construction was considered critical, especially for underground utilities, road, and drainage construction. The role of the Board of Health in building operations and the commissioning plan for building’s operations also received attention.

Regarding traffic control, the feasibility of various measures to improve pedestrian and cyclist safety on Atwater Avenue was debated. Public comments reflected concerns about the safety of running and biking due to current conditions, with suggestions to engage with road users for recreational activities. The board proposed forming a group to explore potential solutions and planned to reconvene for further discussions.

The board deliberated on the conditions and waiver list for a proposed project, deciding to continue the public hearing at a later date. The reopening of the public hearing for the reart and morser talks included supportive letters and additional material. The financial aspects, including project costs, funding sources, and revenue projections, were also a point of discussion.

The Tux Point project was another key topic, with the board focusing on the replacement of damaged railings with historically accurate ones and ensuring the project’s appropriateness for the site’s historic nature and public use. The submission of a 90% plan set for review before bidding was also discussed.

Lastly, the session touched on the Community Preservation Committee’s funding availability, downtown improvements, and potential partnerships for housing developments. The interpretation of MBTA zoning in relation to age-restricted housing units and the implications for housing developments were discussed, with future meetings planned to delve deeper into these topics.