The primary focus of the meeting was a public hearing for Matt Van Wart’s application to replace a deteriorating, non-conforming garage. The existing structure, located approximately 1.1 feet from the property line in District D, presented a zoning challenge, as regulations require a five-foot setback.

During deliberations, members voiced concerns about setting a precedent that could impact future property developments. The board debated whether allowing a non-conforming structure to be rebuilt in its current position would undermine zoning regulations. One member highlighted the need to consider not only the current property’s aesthetics but also future implications for the community, stating, “When we think about it, we got to think not just of the current with the future.”

Neighbor Robert Gamble, present at the hearing, offered support for the project’s location, noting that moving the garage could lead to unsightly issues like refuse accumulation. Gamble’s approval, while significant, was weighed against the bylaws’ intent. Georgia Pendagast, participating via Zoom, emphasized the importance of considering the overall harmony of the project with the neighborhood, even if the law does not explicitly require conforming changes to existing non-conforming structures.

A discussion ensued about the new garage’s compliance aspects, particularly the proposed lean-to addition. Some members suggested relocating the lean-to to another side of the garage to mitigate additional non-conformity concerns. However, the applicant expressed apprehensions about the impact on driveway access and overall property layout, adding complexity to the board’s decision-making process.

The deliberation also touched on broader zoning implications, particularly whether demolishing and replacing a non-conforming structure necessitates compliance with current standards. It was clarified that the bylaws permit rebuilding non-conforming structures under certain conditions, facilitating the approval of the new garage through a special permit.

Ultimately, after thorough consideration, the board voted unanimously to approve Van Wart’s special permit, with specific conditions outlined to address zoning concerns. The decision required filing a written notice with the town clerk and allowed a 20-day appeal period before building permits could be issued. This process would ensure adherence to procedural guidelines while allowing time for any potential appeals.

In addition to the garage permit discussion, the board briefly addressed procedural matters, including the review of minutes from previous meetings and upcoming agenda items. These included applications for a dormer, a large accessory dwelling unit (ADU), and a notable change of use for another non-conforming structure.