0:00The council confronted a agenda item regarding an application by High-Profile Maple Shade LLC to establish a cannabis retail dispensary on Route 38 West. The applicant’s attorney requested a postponement, which led to a council discussion to determine an appropriate date for further deliberations. Ultimately, the council decided to postpone the decision until April 7, 2025, contingent upon the applicant renotifying the necessary parties. This decision aims to ensure compliance with the 120-day deadline for a decision while allowing time for any additional information the applicant may provide. The attorney clarified that the application was complete, and should the applicant choose to present earlier, renotification would still be required. This postponement reflects the council’s caution in handling applications that may have implications for the community.

19:12In another prominent decision, the council approved a plan to upgrade the electrical supply for local customers, addressing longstanding concerns about the adequacy of the current infrastructure. The approved plan includes specific conditions to enhance the project’s environmental and community impact. Among these conditions is the installation of an 8-foot-8-inch high security fence to ensure site security. The project also requires compliance with the engineer’s report, granting buffer variances within allowable limits. A variance was also granted to permit building alignment differing from the road frontage due to a substantial setback, eliminating the need for additional screening. Furthermore, applicants must submit a sidewalk easement for attorney and engineer approval, and adhere to recommendations from a Phase One study on the removal of boxes and soil. These measures aim to ensure that the infrastructure improvements are both effective and minimally disruptive to the community.

The meeting also served as an orientation for new board members. The board’s engineer emphasized the importance of understanding site plan and use variance processes, proposing a training course to familiarize both new and existing members with these procedures. He noted the necessity for board members to exercise their rights to approve or deny proposals, despite external pressures. This guidance aims to equip members with the knowledge and confidence to make informed decisions that align with the community’s best interests.

0:00Additionally, the council adopted resolutions from a previous meeting, including an application from Trung Win Senior for a variance related to an oversized garage on Cherry Avenue. The council had previously agreed to grant the variance on the condition that the garage’s size be reduced and the walls surfaced with acceptable materials. The applicant also committed to consolidating the three lots comprising his property to comply with the council’s requirements. The resolution was adopted unanimously.

Another resolution addressed a request by PSEG to expand their facility on Route 73. The council acknowledged the need for PSEG to update equipment to meet regulatory standards, with no public comments recorded during the application review. The resolution was adopted without further debate, allowing PSEG to proceed with necessary upgrades.

19:12The meeting concluded with procedural notes aimed at improving future sessions. Members agreed that when applications are discussed, the chairman would read them into the record and explain the rules for public engagement.