The council’s proposed housing ordinance, which mandates inspections for homes before they can be sold, dominated the meeting. Residents voiced concerns that the ordinance could impose undue financial burdens, particularly on elderly homeowners and those wishing to sell properties “as is.” A resident highlighted potential difficulties, stating that the ordinance might deter buyers from purchasing homes that require repairs, arguing, “Who’s going to want to purchase it?” Others echoed these sentiments, fearing that the changes would disproportionately affect low-income families and seniors.

The ordinance also faced scrutiny over its technical requirements, such as the stipulation for homes to have a minimum of 100 amp electrical service. A resident noted that some properties remain compliant with 60 amp service, urging the council to reconsider this requirement. Concerns about inspections for chronic water issues were raised, with residents questioning the subjectivity of property assessments by inspectors.

Real estate professionals at the meeting emphasized the importance of maintaining property values while expressing reservations about the potential impact on the housing market. One attorney argued that the ordinance could hinder property sales, as buyers might hesitate to proceed without a clear understanding of compliance costs. This discussion highlighted a divide between those advocating for stricter regulations to ensure safety and those wary of the financial and bureaucratic burdens on homeowners.

The topic of short-term rentals, particularly Airbnb, also came under scrutiny. Business owner Charles Thomas voiced strong opposition to the Airbnb model within residential neighborhoods, citing past experiences in nearby Cherry Hill where short-term rentals led to public disturbances. He argued for equitable regulation, stating, “If you’re going to hold the other renters to that standard, then you should be holding the Airbnb to that standard,” highlighting concerns about frequent occupant changes and the strain on town inspection resources.

Contrasting views were presented by other residents, who defended the benefits of Airbnb, noting positive experiences with short-term rentals in their neighborhoods. One resident emphasized the need for balanced regulations that protect both property owners and community interests without stifling business opportunities.

The council discussed possible enforcement mechanisms for rental properties, with proposed fines ranging from $250 to $1,500 per violation. The conversation emphasized the need for clarity on enforcement and the challenges posed by large gatherings at rental properties. A motion was made to table the ordinance for further review.

Public participation during the meeting reflected widespread concerns over transparency and communication from the council. Residents advocated for more frequent council meetings to enhance public engagement and ensure community input on issues. The council acknowledged these concerns.

In other business, the council addressed updates on municipal projects, including construction work on North Cole’s Road and the nearing completion of the Eastfront project. Concerns about the turf field’s end of life were discussed, with plans to consult the school district on financing options for its replacement. The police chief reported on successful community events and ongoing efforts to address illegal activities at local businesses, highlighting collaboration with law enforcement agencies to tackle these issues.