0:28The application from Holly and Nicholas Keri, who were seeking to transform a woodworking shop and residence into a beauty salon with residential space, was the most notable item discussed. Concerns were initially raised regarding Nicholas Keri’s position as a township employee and the appearance of impropriety in his involvement. However, these were resolved by his agreement to refrain from testifying, allowing the board to focus on the merits of the application.

Joseph Walters from Realty Mark Properties presented on behalf of the applicants, detailing the property’s history and Holly Keri’s extensive experience in cosmetology. Holly Keri outlined her vision for the Hollywood Color Room salon, emphasizing specialized services like hair coloring and extensions, and her hope to attract clients from outside the area. The salon would operate from Tuesday to Saturday, with a maximum of ten employees at peak times. Parking availability was thoroughly vetted, with surveys indicating ample nearby spaces, and operational strategies were discussed to minimize congestion.

Signage for the salon became a point of debate, as the proposed sign extending from the building was initially deemed non-compliant with zoning regulations. The board considered a variance for the sign, weighing the need for cohesive aesthetics along Main Street against the business zone designation of the area. Ultimately, the approval allowed for the business to move forward with conditions ensuring compliance with township standards.

1:57:24Simultaneously, the board tackled broader issues of safety and zoning compliance, notably through the annual report highlighting ongoing enforcement challenges. Members expressed concern over unsafe living conditions, recognizing their limited authority to initiate inspections and emphasizing the need for township management to address these issues. The board’s review of the report sought to identify matters that might require zoning code changes.

36:47In parallel discussions, the board examined an application for a pre-existing non-conforming use certificate for a four-unit multi-family dwelling on McCrae Lane. The property, which has operated as a multi-family residence since at least 1940, faced scrutiny over its historical documentation. The applicant’s representative presented evidence, including newspaper ads and census data, to support the property’s continuous use predating the 1956 zoning ordinance. Despite some board members’ skepticism, the motion to approve the certificate was passed, with a commitment to refer safety and compliance concerns to township management.

1:35:29Public comments highlighted ongoing community concerns, with neighbors voicing apprehensions about property maintenance and the implications of multi-family designations on neighborhood dynamics. One resident pointed out a crane that had long been an eyesore in a property’s side yard, exemplifying broader frustrations with property upkeep and the perceived lack of owner involvement.