The proposed stormwater utility ordinance aims to establish a funding mechanism dedicated to managing stormwater infrastructure, a historically underfunded area due to competing budget priorities. A significant feature of the ordinance is the creation of a “lockbox” to ensure funds allocated to stormwater management are protected from being redirected by future governing bodies. The ordinance proposes fees based on the amount of impervious surfaces on properties, diverging from the traditional reliance on general real estate taxes. This approach is designed to motivate property owners to incorporate better stormwater management practices, as those with more impervious surfaces would incur higher fees.

The council members acknowledged the ordinance’s potential to generate new revenue for addressing stormwater issues but emphasized that it does not directly solve engineering or environmental challenges. Concerns were raised about the complexity and cost of implementing the utility, particularly the setup costs for feasibility studies and ongoing administrative expenses. The township would also face a recurring fee to the state of New Jersey, projected to start at $45,000 annually, based on first-year revenue estimates of $900,000. Discussions centered on whether the benefits of the utility would justify these costs, with comparisons drawn to New Brunswick, the only other New Jersey municipality to have progressed with such initiatives.

Additionally, the council considered a suggestion to extend the challenge period for residents contesting the stormwater fee assessment from 30 to 90 days. While some members supported the extension, others expressed concerns about the practical challenges it posed, particularly in delaying the ordinance’s implementation. The conversation highlighted the need for transparency and clear communication with residents about the new fee structure, prompting calls for an information campaign to educate the community.

The discussion moved to public comments, with Virginia Lamb voicing support for the ordinance. Lamb suggested classifying artificial turf as an impermeable surface, sparking a debate on the definition of such surfaces. She also proposed partnerships with organizations for developing a credit manual to encourage green infrastructure measures. The council acknowledged Lamb’s points but deferred discussions on artificial turf, emphasizing the primary focus on establishing the utility.

The council also addressed administrative matters, including the appointment of Cindy Price as the new public information officer and ongoing efforts to secure an early voting location in Maplewood. Updates were provided on the scheduling of the annual reorganization meeting and the primary election date, with considerations given to religious observances.