08:26In response, a council member explained the decision to rebid, stating that the initial bids were deemed unbalanced, with some proposals heavily backloaded in their financial commitments. The council member clarified that the new bids were for one year with options for extensions in subsequent years. Schaefer countered that the bid packet contained errors and inconsistencies, contributing to the confusion.

Despite Schaefer’s protests, the council ultimately decided to proceed with awarding the bid for a one-year term, with potential options for extension based on performance and future needs. The council acknowledged the need to review and possibly revise the bid specifications to prevent similar issues in the future.

18:27In addition to the bidding controversy, the public comment session included concerns about the temporary closure of the library until July 6, which some residents found inconvenient. The council assured residents that efforts were underway to address the situation, though details remained sparse.