Marlborough Finance Committee Approves TIF for $200 Million Crime Lab Project Amid Concerns

The Marlborough Finance Committee has approved a tax increment financing (TIF) agreement to facilitate the construction of a $200 million crime laboratory for the Massachusetts State Police. The project, a collaboration between Greatland Realty Partners and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, promises to bring 300 permanent full-time jobs to the area. The meeting also addressed the expansion of outdoor seating for local businesses and discussed the acquisition of electric vehicles for the city.

01:23:12The TIF agreement, which allows for the construction and leasing of a new crime laboratory on Martinelo Drive, was the focal point of the meeting. The project aims to establish a 200,000 square foot facility with an investment of approximately $200 million. It is expected to create 300 permanent full-time jobs, comprising 250 relocated positions and 50 new roles. Kevin Shien from Greatland Realty Partners, along with representatives from the Massachusetts Department of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance, presented the project overview. They highlighted the strategic location of the site, which is near major highways, and provided details about the project’s design phase, with construction anticipated to start early next year and completion aimed for early 2028.

01:34:33Counselor Brown expressed enthusiasm for the potential job creation and investment, seeing the project as a significant growth opportunity on a previously vacant lot. However, concerns were raised about the 20-year duration of the TIF, with questions about its long-term financial impact on the city. The TIF is structured to allow the city to benefit from increased property values resulting from the investment, with incremental tax payments associated with the improvements seen as a financial aspect. Still, some members voiced apprehension about setting a precedent that could lead to similar tax exemptions for future projects, potentially complicating the city’s financial landscape.

The discussion also touched on environmental considerations, with inquiries about the building’s sustainability features, such as LEED Silver certification and the inclusion of solar panels and energy-efficient equipment. Despite these concerns, the TIF agreement passed with a vote of 4 to 1.

34:48In addition to the TIF agreement, the committee addressed local business requests for outdoor seating expansion. Flying Dreams Brewing Company, represented by owner David Richardson, sought permission to use parking spaces on Rollins Avenue for outdoor seating from May to November 2025. The proposal aimed to enhance the brewery’s inviting atmosphere, especially given the popularity of outdoor seating post-pandemic. Committee members discussed safety concerns, particularly about the need for stable barriers to protect patrons seated in the parking spaces from vehicular traffic. They also considered the balance between business needs and pedestrian accessibility, ultimately emphasizing the importance of a revised seating plan.

Lashu Brewing and Roasting Company also submitted a request to expand its outdoor seating to include public areas like the new plaza behind City Hall. While the proposal included closing Weed Street on weekends to create a vibrant community space, concerns about road closures and community access were raised. The committee debated the balance between private enterprise and communal use of public spaces, with some members advocating for trial periods to assess the plaza’s potential. The dialogue underscored the need for clear guidelines to manage the use of city property by businesses.

01:55:02The committee further considered the acquisition of electric vehicles for the city’s fleet, proposing a budget allocation of $50,000.

02:00:07Additionally, the meeting addressed salary adjustments for leadership positions in the Department of Public Works (DPW). The proposed salary schedule aimed to attract and retain skilled leadership by providing a four-step salary increase for qualified individuals.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly: