The meeting began with a public comment section that underscored community concerns about the future of the CRA. Ellen Asen from the NAC board expressed her apprehension over the suggestion by a council member to eliminate the CRA, pointing out that a similar proposal in 2012 led to the loss of grants, which negatively impacted the community. Asen stressed that disbanding the CRA could harm local development and urged the council to carefully consider the consequences.

Julie Priest, representing the CRA committee, echoed Asen’s concerns. Priest advocated for resolving these issues to prevent further discussions about dissolving the agency and to focus on improvements that might satisfy the concerns raised. Another public participant, Gary Ear from Port Salerno, acknowledged the council’s efforts but expressed skepticism about the motives behind the proposal to dismantle the CRA, although he refrained from criticizing any specific individuals.

The council then moved on to review the CRA’s fiscal year 2025 first quarter report, presented by Joy Puera. The report provided updates on various projects, including the transition from septic systems to sewer connections, which achieved a 68% connection rate. Significant infrastructure developments were noted, such as the groundbreaking for El Camino and a comprehensive streets vision plan for Golden Gate. The plan included new curbing, traffic calming measures, and enhanced public spaces, with support from the NAC for the proposed improvements.

In Port Salerno, completed sidewalks on Cove Road and plans for Monrovia Park, which were 60% complete, were discussed. The Cornell Avenue streetscape project and the Ripple stormwater Eco art project were also highlighted, with the latter receiving a special recognition award. Residential and commercial permit comparisons showed increased valuations, particularly in the Rio and Golden Gate areas due to new single-family homes and improvements.

The discussion then shifted to the broader topic of community development projects. The council was updated on the Dixie Highway stormwater and streetscape project, which recently received approval to proceed using the semar process. This project includes the installation of the historic Hobes Sound train station. The council expressed enthusiasm for the project, which has been in development for several years due to community efforts.

Attention turned to Port Sero Park Drive improvements, with Ferrera Construction identified as the lowest responsible bidder. The project will be executed in two phases, focusing on utilities and drainage, followed by roadway resurfacing. The estimated cost for the initial phase is $2,448,580, with the second phase expected to be around $444,000. Utility work is anticipated to commence shortly after contract finalization.

The council also discussed the septic to sewer transition project, which is awaiting a notice to proceed. A member emphasized the project’s importance and requested its inclusion in capital project discussions. Additionally, the Golden Gate neighborhood improvements were presented, encompassing plans for new sidewalks, curbing, on-street parking, and other enhancements over the next 10 to 15 years. Funding through the RAISE Grant, offering potential federal assistance, was considered, with discussions of hiring a consultant to aid in the grant application process.

A council member sought clarity on the consultant’s cost and project scope, with a timeline of a year suggested for completion. The council recognized that the full scope might not be achievable in one go, proposing incremental project execution if necessary. The collaborative effort for community improvement was emphasized, with the potential for additional funding from other sources.

The council also approved a grant application for surface transportation infrastructure projects, including public roads and non-motorized projects. There was optimism about leveraging existing infrastructure, such as complete streets and sewer systems, to enhance community safety and connectivity. Lighting was highlighted as a componet, with past issues of insufficient lighting posing safety concerns.

Towards the end of the meeting, a proposal for the Board of County Commissioners to assume responsibilities of the CRA board was discussed. Concerns were raised about the current CRA board’s effectiveness and transparency. One member pointed out the increased tax base and development under the CRA, which has brought economic benefits to the county. However, frustration over opposition to CRA initiatives by some commissioners was noted, with a call for greater community involvement and transparency in decision-making.