The case concerning Shanti Cassidy and Mark El Cassidy III stood out for its complexity and the debate over the duration of violations. Following an inspection on June 12, 2025, the property was cited for repeat violations, including the presence of business materials and vehicles on the county right-of-way. Photographic evidence confirmed the violations, which were presented as exhibits during the meeting. Although the violations were rectified by the subsequent inspection on July 15, the county sought to impose a substantial fine of $24,750 for 33 days of non-compliance. However, a clerical error in the notice of violation, which misidentified the section of the ordinance, became a point of contention. After deliberation, the council concluded that the Cassidys were liable for only 8 days of violations, resulting in a reduced fine of $4,000, alongside $575 in investigation costs.

In another significant case, the Mariner Village Property Owners Association faced scrutiny for failing to maintain preserve areas and removing street trees, contravening a previously approved plan unit development zoning agreement. The council heard testimony regarding the removal of protected street trees and the improper maintenance of preserve areas free of exotic vegetation. The association reached a stipulation agreement with the county, agreeing to a daily fine of $500 for continued violations should compliance not be met by the deadline of January 30, 2032. Administrative costs totaling $575 were also paid prior to the hearing. The hearing emphasized the importance of adherence to development orders and the severe financial repercussions of non-compliance.

Another noteworthy discussion centered around a property violation involving Metalist Homes LLC, which faced allegations of trash accumulation and abandoned trailers. Despite efforts to comply by storing items on trailers as directed by the county, the property remained in violation. The presiding authority ruled that the issues were unresolved, setting a compliance deadline of August 29, 2025, with a daily fine of $100 for continued non-compliance. This case highlighted ongoing tensions between property owners and enforcement officials over differing interpretations of compliance standards.

The council also addressed a case involving North River Shores LLC, where a staircase was installed without the necessary permits. A stipulation agreement was reached, mandating compliance by October 31, 2025, with potential fines of $100 per day thereafter.

In a separate case, the property owned by Louis B. Christie was scrutinized for the presence of trash and debris, despite previous compliance regarding site addressing. The council ordered Christie to resolve the trash issue by August 29, 2025, with a $100 per day fine for non-compliance.