The proposal, initially introduced as the Kaloa Creek Ranch project, includes public benefits such as contributions to environmental restoration and educational programs. The growth management director presented the application, with the staff recommending approval for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning agreement. The applicant, representing the Basque family, underscored the conservation-centric approach to the development. By aiming for a gross density of one unit per 22 acres, the project intends to minimize its residential footprint and potential environmental impact, especially concerning septic systems and wetland preservation.

The applicant’s presentation provided an overview of the project, highlighting the intended rural character and substantial open space, while also detailing the economic benefits predicted for the next 30 years. These include an increase in taxable value and public benefits like the restoration of the Banner Lake system and educational initiatives with local institutions.

Carol Fitzpatrick, a resident, raised concerns about water management issues and the safety of Bridge Road, given the potential increase in traffic. Greg Braun from the Guardians of Martin County, praised the project’s quality but questioned the implications for water quality. Dena Peterson expressed skepticism about the project’s compatibility with the natural habitat and its true beneficiaries. Kyla Shay, president of Trailside HOA, cited a critical letter from South Florida Water Management to underscore her environmental and infrastructure concerns. Geraldine G. flagged the incomplete nature of the developer agreement and transparency issues. In contrast, Brandon Tucker supported the project, emphasizing its environmental and economic advantages, and Jennifer P. from UF IFAS Extension spoke in favor of the proposed partnership with the University of Florida for educational programs.

The planning agency meeting also touched on broader community concerns, such as the potential long-term impacts on healthcare infrastructure, rural lifestyle, and ongoing environmental monitoring. The debate was intense, with a vote concluding in favor of the development agreement, albeit with one member opposing. The discussion spanned topics from stormwater regulations to the need for a sales tax referendum to acquire land and prevent development. A revised disclosure related to the development was also addressed.