The evaluation of Superintendent Brandi Kwong drew attention, with members expressing dissatisfaction with the process and results. Concerns were also raised about the lack of teacher input in the evaluation process and the low response rate to a school culture survey, which was seen as undermining efforts to assess engagement.

Another member emphasized the need for a thorough understanding of the evaluation process, noting that it should be delayed until after the results of a $140,000 audit were available. The member pointed out contradictions within the evaluation’s language, which simultaneously rated proficiency and highlighted areas needing improvement, particularly in school culture. The discussion revealed a desire among committee members for the evaluation to accurately represent the state of the schools rather than present a homogenized perspective.

In addition to the evaluation process, concerns were raised about staffing challenges, particularly within the custodial and administrative departments. Members highlighted the inadequate staffing levels, with one noting that staff were frequently “doing five jobs,” leading to burnout and a perceived lack of support from administration.

The conversation also touched on the systemic issues of fiscal constraints faced by the district, which complicate efforts to improve staff well-being and job satisfaction. An electronic system for tracking staff vacations and absences was introduced as a measure to streamline operations and better anticipate staffing shortages.

The committee also deliberated on the potential redistricting within the school system. Members discussed forming a subcommittee to explore the implications of redistricting, emphasizing the need for clear objectives, whether financial savings or community-driven changes. Concerns were raised about disparities among schools, particularly in terms of diversity and low-income demographics, as well as the logistical challenges of adjusting school configurations.

The historical context of redistricting, with the last changes occurring over two decades ago, was noted, prompting suggestions to consult external firms specializing in such evaluations. The committee emphasized the importance of community involvement and transparency throughout the process, recognizing the potential emotional impact on students and families.

In the realm of curriculum and contract management, the meeting addressed the implementation of the Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA) literacy program. A deadline of September 29 was set for full implementation, with resources from the PRISM grant and support from TNTP expected to aid in the process. Concerns were expressed about delays in finalizing contracts, particularly for Advanced Placement courses, which were attributed to changes in contract processes and a backlog of issues in the city solicitor’s office.

The committee also discussed the implications of not having a formalized financial agreement with the city, which contributed to feelings of distrust. There were calls for future dialogues to establish a more transparent financial arrangement, alongside proposals to surplus two school buildings for potential conversion into affordable housing for low-income seniors.