42:35The most urgent topic at the meeting was the proposed reduction in the number of reading specialists—positions deemed critical for supporting students with reading difficulties. A reading specialist addressed the committee, emphasizing the profound impact that such cuts would have on students who struggle with literacy. The specialist noted that the district had already seen a drastic reduction in reading specialists from 33 before the pandemic to just nine, with further cuts threatening to reduce the number to five. This reduction, they argued, was insufficient to meet the growing needs of students requiring assistance, a sentiment echoed by several public speakers who stressed the importance of reading as a foundational skill for all learning.

01:07:59Public comments also focused heavily on the potential cuts to the fine arts programs. Multiple speakers, including students and parents, argued that arts education is not a luxury but an essential component of a well-rounded education. They warned that eliminating or reducing these programs would strip students of vital opportunities for self-expression and personal growth. A student from the Methuen High School drama club highlighted how participation in theater had fostered community and personal development, arguing that cutting these programs would hurt students’ ability to build confidence and other transferable skills.

Amid these discussions, a former teacher’s letter criticized committee member Maxwell for her comments about the district’s budget and staff. The letter accused Maxwell of spreading misinformation, particularly regarding the district’s spending compared to nearby Malden, and questioned her rationale for advocating cuts to preschool funding. The letter further accused Maxwell of making unfounded claims about staff falsifying literacy data, which other speakers also condemned. A kindergarten and reading teacher emphasized the importance of integrity and respect within the school community and criticized Maxwell’s statements for undermining the efforts of dedicated professionals.

02:07:52The superintendent provided an update on the fiscal year 2026 budget, detailing adjustments made based on feedback from committee members. These adjustments included restoring certain positions—such as classroom teachers, reading specialists, and behavioral support specialists—to maintain manageable class sizes and ensure adequate support for students. Despite these restorations, the committee faces a significant gap between the requested budget and the city’s proposal, with operating budget projections exceeding the city’s figures by $3.7 million.

47:04The committee’s discussion on budgetary issues was further complicated by the challenge of aligning their requests with available city resources. Members debated the feasibility of submitting a “full budget” to the city council, with some arguing that doing so without the likelihood of approval would be unproductive. The complexities of budget planning were evident, with members acknowledging the direct implications for teachers and students and expressing a commitment to protecting school budgets while advocating for full funding.

03:13:37In addition to budget concerns, the meeting addressed the need for a new K-4 ELA curriculum, as the existing lease for the Wonders program is expiring. Dr. Golski presented updates on the literacy program selection process, with the committee considering CKLA and EL Education as potential alternatives. The projected cost for adopting the CKLA program was approximately $181,000 annually, comparable to current expenditures.