1:09The committee devoted attention to the revitalization of a historic building in South Beach, emphasizing its importance in reflecting the evolving demographics of Miami Beach since the 1960s. The building is in good condition, requiring primarily the installation of a new elevator. However, concerns were raised about the proposed relocation of the senior lunchroom to a windowless space. A committee member strongly opposed this plan, arguing that seniors deserve to dine in naturally lit environments, especially given the current waiting list of 150 seniors for meal services. There was a push for immediate action to start meal services in a well-lit area, even as construction plans continue for other parts of the building. This urgency was shared by other committee members, with an emphasis on coordination with relevant departments to expedite the lunchroom’s operation without delays.

Logistical aspects of the senior meal program were discussed, with plans to issue an Invitation to Negotiate for service providers soon. The committee also explored the potential use of the building’s auditorium and central area for community activities, including police programs and youth camps. Funding for the senior meal program and summer camps has already been approved. Additionally, the idea of utilizing outdoor spaces for meals was proposed to create an engaging atmosphere for seniors during the transition phase.

52:33Turning to housing, the committee tackled issues surrounding the proposed Collins Park Artist Workforce Housing project. A key point of contention was the affordability and pricing of units based on stipulated area median income (AMI) levels. The committee addressed concerns about the minimum unit sizes, with studios ranging from 487 to 486 square feet, one-bedroom units from 481 to 513 square feet, and two-bedroom units from 695 to 875 square feet. Rental prices were noted at $2,300 for studios, $2,500 for one-bedroom units, and $3,000 for two-bedroom units. Questions were raised about the pricing structure, particularly how similarly priced units across different sizes could affect household eligibility. There was a strong sentiment against proceeding with the current proposal unless it could be guaranteed that housing would remain below market rates. Some members argued that public funds should not support housing smaller and more expensive than existing options.

The conversation acknowledged the need for a variety of housing options, including affordable and missing middle housing, and emphasized understanding different types of workforce housing and achievable pricing levels. The committee deliberated on the RFP process for the housing project, stressing the importance of robust data and further inquiry into desired outcomes. The goal was to deliver a mix of housing options catering to various income levels while ensuring financial viability. There were calls for transparency in the leasing process and verification of unit dimensions. The need for a minimum unit size was noted, but further analysis was proposed before reaching a consensus.

2:29:48Additionally, the committee explored the revitalization of Washington Avenue, focusing on enhancing lighting and streetscaping. Various sidewalk material options were presented, with a preference for the $1.9 million exposed shell option due to its potential transformative impact on this tourist corridor. Maintenance challenges were discussed, particularly the difficulties of keeping Washington Avenue clean due to its high foot traffic and proximity to food establishments. The committee debated using specialty materials that could trap dirt and waste, complicating maintenance efforts. A proposal to incorporate a combination of red flat cement and highlighted specialty finishes aimed to balance aesthetic appeal with practicality.

1:55:54The committee also addressed the creation of a standalone marketing budget for economic development. Past efforts, including the “Make a Bold Move” initiative, were highlighted for their success, with a current marketing budget of $100,000 per year. There was interest in increasing this budget for the upcoming fiscal year, recognizing the potential to attract a broader range of businesses and visitors to Miami Beach. The committee discussed leveraging local business leaders as ambassadors and incorporating promotional materials into convention materials to bolster economic development.