The most pressing topic involved the application for DRB 24131 on North Meridian, where the applicant sought approval to enclose an exterior courtyard at the penthouse level of the Ritz Carlton. The proposed modification aimed to mitigate the “wind tunnel” effect created by high winds. A critical aspect of the discussion centered on the necessity of obtaining an approval letter from the building’s homeowners’ association, a requirement the applicant had not yet fulfilled. Board members underscored the importance of having this documentation before any formal action, emphasizing the need for community agreement in the design review process. Despite procedural concerns, the board expressed a general consensus in support of the application, recognizing the logical enhancements to the penthouse’s functionality. The applicant assured the board that the necessary letter from the association president was available, although it was not presented at the meeting.

Another application involved modifications to a previously approved design for a new two-story residence on Still Water Drive. The applicant requested a height variance to accommodate functional space within the under story, increasing the total height to 26 feet 8 inches, in compliance with current regulations. Concerns arose from neighboring residents regarding construction progress and potential encroachments into setbacks, prompting a continuation from the previous month. However, a public speaker raised issues about construction occurring prior to approval. The speaker cited concerns about privacy invasions and inadequate communication with neighbors.

The board ultimately approved the variance request, acknowledging the applicant’s adherence to regulations and the need for ongoing compliance monitoring.

The board then shifted focus to a new proposal for a five-story multifamily building on Mars Drive on Normandy Isle. The design featured a contemporary style with Morpheus-shaped stucco grids and open corridors for cross ventilation. Despite support from design staff, board members noted discrepancies between the original concept sketches and the final design, urging the architect to better integrate the organic concept into the overall design. Concerns about bicycle rack placement and security were also raised, given Miami Beach’s reputation for bicycle theft.

In addition to project-specific discussions, the board considered a proposal for a two-story residence on South Coconut Lane. The design was described as contemporary with a limestone-clad half-cylindrical volume on the front elevation. Modifications were made to alleviate massing concerns, and the applicant sought a waiver for open space requirements. Public comments highlighted the owner’s long-standing community ties and efforts to involve neighbors in the project, which was generally well-received by the board.