The most compelling topic of the meeting was the proposed redevelopment of the former food fair grocery store, a project that entailed a substantial demolition and partial restoration of the historic building, along with the addition of a new mixed-use structure. The plan included the reintroduction of the building’s original storefront system and a particular focus on retaining the historical pylon – a feature deemed significant in post-war architecture. The property owner’s representative and the design team presented plans, emphasizing their commitment to preserving the original elements of the building, such as the vertical and v-shaped elements from the original pylon, while integrating them into the dynamic new design. The staff supported the design and recommended approval of the application.

Board members engaged in a review of the proposed design, delving into specifics such as the materials to be used for the zigzag elements connecting the balconies and the symbolism of the original signage tower in relation to the new structure. The board also discussed the challenges of integrating the historical pylon signage with residential use, acknowledging the practical challenges but underlining the cultural significance of such elements. Amidst the debate, the Miami Design Preservation League voiced support for the project. The board concluded with a conditional approval for the project, emphasizing the need for further exploration and reinterpretation of the vertical element.

Another discussion focused on the proposed canopy structure along 15th Street and a variance from the required setbacks for a building on Ocean Drive. The canopy, designed to provide weather protection, prompted a debate over its architectural compatibility with the historic district. The proposed reduction in setback from 40.35 ft to 6.86 ft due to the irregularly shaped lot and the non-conforming setbacks of existing structures was a particularly issue. The board ultimately approved the canopy with the stipulation that the design undergo further modification.

The proposed conversion of The Clevelander to a residential project with no outdoor entertainment represented another point of discussion. The representative for the owner presented the company’s experience in developing projects within heritage-sensitive areas and outlined two potential routes for the project, including one that might allow for affordable housing. The board engaged in a conversation about the proposal’s massing, height, and the potential impact on the historic preservation of the area but did not reach a conclusive decision, opting to continue the discussion at a subsequent meeting.

Public concerns about traffic, environmental impact, and the overall aesthetic of the neighborhood were addressed.

The meeting also touched upon the broader implications of the proposed developments, such as their impact on infrastructure and the preservation of the city’s historic buildings. The board considered the necessity of conducting sightline studies to better understand the potential ramifications of the proposed Essex Pinnacle development on the surrounding area.