1:54:47The focal point of the meeting was the proposed redevelopment project on West Avenue. An applicant presented plans for transforming the site, proposing an increase in building height and density to address economic viability and construction costs. However, this proposal faced strong opposition from community members, with concerns about its compatibility with the neighborhood’s character and potential impacts on living conditions. Critics raised alarms about the project’s scale, expressing fears that it might set a precedent for future developments that could overwhelm the neighborhood. During public comments, one resident highlighted the overwhelming opposition from a recent meeting where a vast majority of participants voted against the project, describing it as a “pink brutalist blob” incompatible with the area.

2:11:50Further complicating matters, the developers argued that the project would provide public benefits, such as replacing the problematic Bikini Hostel with a park or garage, which they believed would enhance the neighborhood’s walkability and safety. Yet, numerous residents viewed these benefits skeptically. Another speaker underscored concerns that the development would primarily cater to wealthy individuals, contributing little to local businesses, and urged the board to adhere strictly to established zoning laws.

3:05:02The board also discussed alternative proposals for Lincoln Road, aimed at revitalizing the area through mixed-use development. These proposals suggested increasing building heights and floor area ratios to encourage affordable housing options. A developer emphasized the vision of creating a vibrant neighborhood with residential units above retail spaces, targeting working-class residents rather than luxury housing. This concept raised concerns about the potential loss of historical integrity and the practical challenges of controlling outdoor noise, which could affect residential comfort.

2:48:17Board members expressed differing views on the proposals, with some advocating for modernization and others cautioning against changes that might disrupt the neighborhood’s character. The historical preservation board’s role in maintaining the area’s aesthetic integrity was highlighted, with members stressing the importance of carefully balancing development aspirations with community needs.

The meeting concluded with discussions on incentivizing residential development along Lincoln Road, including amendments to FAR and building heights. Although the proposed changes aimed to support affordable housing, concerns about building heights and maintaining the street’s character persisted. The board recognized the need for comprehensive community input and further review before making final recommendations to the city commission.