The proposed modifications to the Royal Palm Hotel’s CUP included reducing the destination restaurant’s occupancy by 164 and removing an existing dance floor, while the lobby bar’s capacity would increase by 52. The pool deck, currently designated for hotel guests only, was proposed to be converted into a flexible space for hotel functions but would remain closed to the public. Outdoor entertainment was planned to cease by 10 p.m., aligning with Miami Beach’s noise ordinance.

A former planning board member, Henry Stoer, requested a four-week continuance to negotiate further with the hotel. He argued that the hotel had been unresponsive and had not engaged in good faith discussions, stating, “It is an abuse of discretion to allow this to move forward today.” In contrast, Carter McDall, representing the hotel, maintained that the hotel had been cooperative and had provided a draft of the amended order for review. Despite Stoer’s request, the board denied the continuance, allowing the application to proceed.

Concerns about noise control were central to the discussions, especially with the upcoming World Cup serving as a backdrop for potential loud events. One board member commented on the need for effective noise management, pointing out that World Cup celebrations could lead to substantial noise complaints. Residents expressed skepticism about the hotel’s ability to maintain ambient sound levels during such events, with some recalling past experiences of loud disturbances.

The board ultimately decided against a continuance, and the hotel proceeded with presenting its proposal. The applicant emphasized that the same music could be played at ambient levels without an entertainment permit but sought permission for higher volumes during special events like weddings. The presentation included details of the property layout, highlighting modifications aimed at enhancing guest experience while maintaining operational conditions like shared driveways.

The board also reviewed other significant proposals, including a development on Collins Avenue, which involved the installation of mechanical parking lifts. Concerns were raised about noise and the compatibility of such systems with the existing low-density residential zone. Residents feared that the project could disrupt the neighborhood’s character, citing issues like potential noise from the lifts and traffic congestion in the narrow alleyways.

Despite these concerns, the applicant argued that the project complied with zoning requirements and would provide necessary upgrades to the area. The board approved the valet parking proposal, contingent on noise from the lifts not being plainly audible to neighbors, and emphasized that the parking operations would not impact the surrounding community.

Additionally, the board discussed amendments to land development regulations for a project on Washington Avenue. The proposal sought to increase the floor area ratio and height limit, sparking concerns about the impact on the historic district. The board acknowledged public input and emphasized the need for residential development in the urban core, balancing this with the preservation of neighborhood character.