The meeting commenced with a prayer and procedural formalities, transitioning swiftly to the issue of the District 4 vacancy. Commissioners deliberated whether to appoint a successor or hold a special election. The consensus leaned heavily towards a special election. One commissioner highlighted the significance of community involvement, asserting that a special election would prevent any accusations of bias and uphold democratic principles.

Ralph Rosado emerged as a focal point during public comments. Known for his deep roots in District 4, Rosado is recognized for his past role as a city manager and contributions to the citizens oversight board for the Miami Forever Bond. In his speech, Rosado detailed his efforts in revitalizing local parks, particularly Douglas Park, and managing projects related to flooding and affordable housing. He expressed a desire to serve the district, stating, “It would be the honor of a lifetime to work hand in hand with you to represent a district and a community that I dearly love.”

Public sentiment was divided, with many advocating for Rosado’s appointment due to his qualifications and community involvement. However, there was also a strong push for a special election, emphasizing the need for constituents to elect their representative. Speakers like Ariva, the chairman of the LGBTQ advisory board, and Brenda Barank stressed the importance of letting voters decide, arguing against bypassing democratic processes in favor of expediency.

Financial considerations were thoroughly discussed, with a special election estimated to cost around $380,000. Concerns about voter turnout and budget constraints were raised, but proponents of the election argued that financial considerations should not overshadow the principle of voter representation. One commissioner noted that past special elections incurred lower costs and emphasized the need for transparency throughout the process.

The commission outlined plans for the upcoming election, with a qualifying period from April 21 to April 25. Early voting was also arranged, with a proposal for three days of early voting at traditional District 4 locations. The city clerk was tasked with confirming these arrangements with the supervisor of elections office.