The most notable issue was a variance request by resident Latus Hernandez, who sought to retain an existing canopy that exceeded the maximum allowed projection into the rear yard by 2.8 feet. The canopy’s 12.8-foot projection represented a 16.85% variance from the town’s regulations. Despite the canopy meeting some development pattern requirements and being well-supported by neighbors, the planning staff recommended denial. Their primary concern was the canopy’s failure to comply with specific zoning requirements, including maintaining a proper rear setback.

During the discussion, Hernandez presented community support for the canopy, citing signatures gathered from neighbors. She emphasized the necessity of the covered space due to the open design of her patio. The board deliberated on the potential to modify the structure to meet existing regulations by adjusting the columns and beams, which would involve shortening the canopy by about two feet. However, the board reiterated the importance of obtaining proper permits for any modifications, as the existing structure was installed without them.

Ultimately, the board voted to deny the variance request, agreeing with staff recommendations that emphasized adhering to zoning regulations and addressing code violations.

In contrast, the board approved a variance request for a swimming pool installation at a single-family home on Lake Valerie, owned by Candace Spears. The pool proposal involved an 8-foot and 1-inch encroachment beyond the property’s TI line. Despite the absence of letters of support from neighbors, the planning staff recommended approval, arguing that the development was compatible with the neighborhood’s character.

The pool proposal was characterized by unique circumstances, including the home’s construction in the 1980s, which resulted in its unusual proximity to the TI line. Staff noted that the variance would still leave a significant 38 feet of unencumbered slope area, reducing potential impacts on the surrounding environment. Board members were familiar with the area and recognized the challenges posed by older homes that predated current zoning regulations.

The board deliberated on the pool’s placement, with some members suggesting moving it further east to reduce encroachment. However, the consensus was that the current positioning was suitable, given the property’s unique layout. After discussion, the board approved the variance, acknowledging the reasonableness of the request and the minimized pool size compared to standard proposals.

An development during the meeting was the resignation of the chairperson, effective at 9:00 PM. The chairperson expressed gratitude for the opportunity to serve alongside board members and highlighted the integrity and fairness exhibited by the group. The resignation prompted discussions about electing a new chairperson to serve until the next scheduled elections in April. The vice chair was considered a potential candidate, with staff outlining the election process for the board to follow.