The proposal, introduced by a member with a background in archaeology, aims to conduct an inventory of the bridges, some of which date back to the mid-1800s and carry New Jersey Transit traffic over local roads. The effort seeks to recognize these structures as integral components of the town’s historic fabric. A particular emphasis was placed on the large brick arch bridge on Route 124 entering the Short Hills area, noted for its historical and aesthetic value.

Proper documentation would ensure that any work performed respects the historical integrity of the structures. The commission expressed concerns that without formal recognition, these bridges might be replaced, potentially erasing vital pieces of the town’s history.

Dialogue during the meeting highlighted the necessity of a structured process involving New Jersey Transit, which owns these bridges. The commission acknowledged New Jersey Transit as a generally good steward of historic resources but stressed the importance of formal designation to protect the bridges. The proposed survey, estimated to cost around $30,000, would involve comprehensive research, including historical photographs and detailed assessments to meet state standards.

The commission also deliberated on the potential financial implications of the survey, contemplating whether the expenditure could face public or Township Committee scrutiny, given past controversies. Despite these concerns, there was a strong sense of urgency to act swiftly to preserve these historic resources. The commission plans to present the proposal to the Township Committee, advocating for its inclusion in future town planning efforts.

Beyond the bridge preservation efforts, the meeting also addressed updates to the town’s design guidelines, last revised in the 1970s. The guidelines aim to provide clear examples of good and bad design practices for both residential and commercial buildings. A need for a subcommittee to finalize these guidelines was identified, with a focus on making them user-friendly and applicable to both historic and general town planning contexts.

The commission explored the possibility of integrating commercial design guidelines, particularly as new zoning regulations are anticipated. A comparison was made to a new building in Chatham that was designed to blend with the historic town aesthetic, contrasting with some modernist architecture in Millburn that diverges from its historic character. The potential designation of Millburn’s downtown as a historic area was revisited, with the commission acknowledging the need for community education to gain support for such efforts.

Additionally, concerns were raised about the replacement of historic curbing and drainage features with asphalt on Camel Road. The commission recognized the inconsistency in preserving these elements outside designated historic districts and emphasized the need for clarity in the guidelines to ensure such features are maintained.