One of the most notable discussions during the meeting revolved around an application for a property on Elm Street, where the board considered modifications due to the undersized lot. The property, smaller than the zoning requirement, necessitated adjustments to reduce the building’s overall mass and bulk. The applicant’s architect explained the efforts made to address concerns about the building’s perceived size and its impact on neighboring properties. Changes included reducing the building’s depth and eliminating certain dormers, which were seen as contributing to an undesirable visual effect.

Board members expressed initial hesitation regarding the proposed 5.7% increase in floor area ratio, especially given previous similar applications in the neighborhood. However, site visits and plan assessments led to a consensus that the addition would not detract from the neighborhood’s character. A board member highlighted the challenge posed by the lot’s size, describing it as “extremely, extremely undersized,” which justified the variance request.

An important aspect of the discussions was the proposed use of a permeable surface material, referred to as “grass pave,” intended to maintain the lot’s permeability without increasing coverage. The board scrutinized the material’s aesthetic and functional qualities, considering its impact on the streetscape and neighborhood precedent. Conditions were attached to the variance approval to ensure the permeable area would be maintained, preventing future modifications without board approval.

Another notable application involved a proposal for a property at Wordsworth Road, where the applicant aimed to expand living space by building over an existing garage. The architect presented a plan to add a bedroom while ensuring the design remained minimal and respectful of neighborhood aesthetics. The board appreciated the applicant’s efforts to address privacy concerns by consulting with neighbors and designing the addition without windows facing adjacent properties.

The board approved the application, emphasizing the enhancements to the property’s aesthetic and the minimal variance involved. Members noted the project’s potential to improve neighborhood balance and character while maintaining a considerable distance from neighboring properties.